Andrews Vasanth, Thakar Ranee, Sultan Abdul H
Mayday University Hospital, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Feb;20(2):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0756-y. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
We conducted an audit to evaluate how effective a structured course in the management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) was at imparting knowledge. Training was undertaken using models and cadaveric pig's anal sphincters. An anonymous questionnaire was completed prior to and 8 weeks after the course. Four hundred and ninety seven completed the questionnaire before and 63% returned it after the course. Prior to the course, participants performed on average 14 OASIS repairs independently. Only 13% were satisfied with their level of experience prior to performing their first unsupervised repair. After the course, participants classified OASIS more accurately and changed to evidence-based practice. Particularly, there was a change in identifying (60% vs. 90%; P < 0.0001) and repairing the internal sphincter (60% vs. 90%; P < 0.0001). This audit demonstrated that training in the management of OASIS is suboptimal. Structured training may be effective in changing clinical practice and should be an adjunct to surgical training.
我们进行了一项审核,以评估关于产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)管理的结构化课程在传授知识方面的效果如何。培训采用模型和猪尸体肛门括约肌进行。在课程开始前和课程结束8周后,参与者填写了一份匿名问卷。497人在课程开始前完成了问卷,课程结束后63%的人返还了问卷。课程开始前,参与者平均独立进行14例OASIS修复手术。在首次独立进行修复手术前,只有13%的人对自己的经验水平感到满意。课程结束后,参与者对OASIS的分类更准确,并转向循证实践。特别是,在识别(60%对90%;P<0.0001)和修复内括约肌(60%对90%;P<0.0001)方面有了变化。这项审核表明,OASIS管理方面的培训并不理想。结构化培训可能在改变临床实践方面有效,应作为外科培训的辅助手段。