Brace Christopher L, Sampson Lisa A, Hinshaw J Louis, Sandhu Neil, Lee Fred T
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Clinical Sciences Center, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Jan;20(1):118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.09.021. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
To compare radiofrequency (RF) ablations created by using a sequential technique to those created simultaneously by using a switching algorithm in ex vivo and in vivo liver models.
RF ablation was performed by using either sequential or switched application of three cooled electrodes in a 2-cm triangular array in ex vivo bovine liver (28 total ablations) and in vivo swine liver (12 total ablations) models. For sequential ablations, electrodes were powered for 12 minutes each with a 5-minute rest interval between activations to simulate electrode repositioning. Switched ablations were created by using a multiple-electrode switching system for 12 minutes. Temperatures were measured during ex vivo experiments at four points in the ablation zone. Ablation zones were measured for minimum and maximum diameter, cross-sectional area, and isoperimetric ratio. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon matched pairs tests were used to identify differences between groups.
The switched application created larger and more circular zones of ablation than did the sequential application, with mean (+/-standard deviation) ex vivo cross-sectional areas of 25.4 cm(2) +/- 5 .3 and 18.8 cm(2) +/- 6.6 (P = .001), respectively, and mean in vivo areas of 17.1 cm(2) +/- 5.1 and 13.2 cm(2) +/- 4.2 (P < .05). Higher temperatures and more rapid heating occurred with the switched application; switched treatments were 74% faster than sequential treatments (12 vs 46 minutes). In the sequential group, subsequent ablations grew progressively larger due to local ischemia.
Switched application of three electrodes creates larger, more confluent ablations in less time than sequential application. Thermal synergy and ablation-induced ischemia both substantially influence multiple-electrode ablations.
在离体和活体肝脏模型中,比较使用序贯技术创建的射频(RF)消融灶与使用切换算法同时创建的射频消融灶。
在离体牛肝(共28次消融)和活体猪肝(共12次消融)模型中,通过在2厘米的三角形阵列中序贯或切换应用三个冷却电极来进行射频消融。对于序贯消融,每个电极通电12分钟,激活之间有5分钟的休息间隔以模拟电极重新定位。切换消融通过使用多电极切换系统进行12分钟。在离体实验期间,在消融区的四个点测量温度。测量消融灶的最小和最大直径、横截面积和等周率。使用曼-惠特尼检验和威尔科克森配对检验来确定组间差异。
与序贯应用相比,切换应用产生的消融灶更大且更呈圆形,离体平均(±标准差)横截面积分别为25.4平方厘米±5.3和18.8平方厘米±6.6(P = 0.001),活体平均面积为17.1平方厘米±5.1和13.2平方厘米±4.2(P < 0.05)。切换应用时温度更高且加热更快;切换治疗比序贯治疗快74%(12分钟对46分钟)。在序贯组中,由于局部缺血,后续消融灶逐渐增大。
与序贯应用相比,三个电极的切换应用能在更短时间内产生更大、更融合的消融灶。热协同作用和消融诱导的缺血都对多电极消融有显著影响。