Wang Kung-Liahng, Yang Yuh-Cheng, Wang Tao-Yeuan, Cheng-Yen Lai Jerry, Chen Tze-Chien, Chang Chi-Long
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):204-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802587974.
To reassess the efficacy of the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2000 staging and risk factor scoring system in comparison to the original World Health Organization (WHO) prognostic scoring system (1983) in a single-institute setting.
Retrospective review of the medical records of 89 patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, a regional referral center for northern Taiwan, over a 20-year period.
All selected patients were classified retrospectively by the original WHO prognostic scoring system (1983) and the FIGO 2000 system.
Efficacy as the correlation of risk categorization by percentage of patients between the original WHO scoring system (1983) and the FIGO 2000 system.
The correlation was 97%. Only two patients were classified as middle risk group in the original WHO system (1983), but as high-risk group by the FIGO 2000 system.
There was good correlation between the original WHO (1983) and FIGO 2000 systems. Treatment outcomes by FIGO 2000 system were somewhat better than by the original WHO classification.
在单机构环境中，重新评估国际妇产科联盟（FIGO）2000年分期和危险因素评分系统与最初的世界卫生组织（WHO）预后评分系统（1983年）相比的疗效。
对89例妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者的病历进行回顾性研究。
台北市马偕纪念医院，台湾北部的区域转诊中心，为期20年。
所有入选患者均根据最初的WHO预后评分系统（1983年）和FIGO 2000系统进行回顾性分类。
疗效以最初的WHO评分系统（1983年）和FIGO 2000系统之间患者百分比的风险分类相关性来衡量。
相关性为97%。在最初的WHO系统（1983年）中，只有2例患者被归类为中风险组，但在FIGO 2000系统中被归类为高风险组。
最初的WHO（1983年）和FIGO 2000系统之间存在良好的相关性。FIGO 2000系统的治疗结果略优于最初的WHO分类。
Zotero 插件