Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织/沃瑟斯庞评分与成人淋巴瘤研究组分级在胃黏膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤治疗后评估中的临床病理比较

Clinicopathological comparison of the World Health Organization/Wotherspoon score to the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adult grade for the post-treatment evaluation of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.

作者信息

Shiozawa Eisuke, Norose Tomoko, Kaneko Kazuhiro, Yamochi-Onizuka Toshiko, Takimoto Masafumi, Imawari Michio, Ota Hidekazu

机构信息

Second Department of Pathology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Feb;24(2):307-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05639.x. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The World Health Organization (WHO) has adopted criteria for the histological differential diagnosis of gastric extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (GML) based on the criteria proposed by Wotherspoon in 1993 (WHO/Wotherspoon score). These histological criteria are commonly used by pathologists for initial diagnoses, but have not been adopted uniformly for the post-treatment evaluation of GML. In 2003, the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adult (GELA) proposed a new histological grading system (GELA grade) in preference to use of the WHO/Wotherspoon score for post-treatment evaluation. In the present study, we compared the WHO/Wotherspoon and GELA systems to examine which histological criterion is better for post-treatment evaluation.

METHODS

Fourteen cases of GML under long-term follow up were initially diagnosed according to the WHO criteria with detailed immunohistology, and were periodically evaluated with both histological criteria after anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment. They were also evaluated based on histological stromal changes accompanying the disappearance of lymphoma tissue.

RESULTS

The study showed strong similarities between the WHO/Wotherspoon and GELA systems and no clear advantage of either system for post-treatment evaluation. The GELA grade could not be used for the evaluation of changes in the degree of lymphoma infiltration from pre- to post-treatment because the four-item scale is not comparable with the formal six-point WHO/Wotherspoon scale. Stromal changes in the lamina propria, including an empty appearance and fibrosis, were correlated with lymphoma reduction after treatment and appear to be good indicators for post-treatment evaluation.

CONCLUSION

We propose the utilization of the WHO/Wotherspoon score accompanied by the assessment of stromal changes for the post-treatment evaluation of GML.

摘要

背景与目的

世界卫生组织(WHO)已采用基于1993年沃瑟斯庞提出的标准(WHO/沃瑟斯庞评分)对胃黏膜相关淋巴组织结外边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤(GML)进行组织学鉴别诊断。这些组织学标准通常被病理学家用于初步诊断,但在GML的治疗后评估中尚未得到统一采用。2003年,成人淋巴瘤研究组(GELA)提出了一种新的组织学分级系统(GELA分级),优先用于治疗后评估,而不是使用WHO/沃瑟斯庞评分。在本研究中,我们比较了WHO/沃瑟斯庞和GELA系统,以检查哪种组织学标准更适合治疗后评估。

方法

14例接受长期随访的GML病例最初根据WHO标准进行详细的免疫组织学诊断,并在抗幽门螺杆菌治疗后定期用两种组织学标准进行评估。还根据淋巴瘤组织消失伴随的组织学基质变化进行评估。

结果

研究表明,WHO/沃瑟斯庞和GELA系统之间有很强的相似性,且在治疗后评估中两种系统均无明显优势。GELA分级不能用于评估治疗前后淋巴瘤浸润程度的变化,因为四项量表与正式的六点WHO/沃瑟斯庞量表不可比。固有层的基质变化,包括空泡样外观和纤维化,与治疗后淋巴瘤减少相关,似乎是治疗后评估的良好指标。

结论

我们建议在GML的治疗后评估中采用WHO/沃瑟斯庞评分并结合基质变化评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验