Leppert Wojciech
Chair and Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Osiedle Rusa 25 A, Poznan 61-245, Poland,
Support Care Cancer. 2009 May;17(5):607-12. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0537-7. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
To assess methadone analgesia, adverse effects, and calculation method of equianalgesic doses with oral morphine.
Methadone was administered to 21 opioid-tolerant cancer patients because of pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] > 5) on morphine (ten patients), transdermal fentanyl (TF; four patients), morphine, ketamine, and TF (one patient), tramadol (one patient), pethidine (one patient), pain with drowsiness on morphine with ketamine (three patients), and pain with nausea on morphine (one patient). Dose ratios of equivalent daily dose of oral morphine (ddom) to daily dose of oral methadone (ddomet) were 4:1 (ddom to 100 mg), 6:1 (101-300 mg), 12:1 (301-1,000 mg), and 20:1 (over 1,000 mg). Previous opioid treatment was stopped completely (stop-start approach) in 19 patients; two received methadone and other opioids. The mean ddom before switch was 812 +/- 486 mg. Methadone was administered regularly three times daily; 20 patients received oral methadone, one patient received rectal suppositories. Breakthrough pain was treated with methadone (half of regular dose), morphine, fentanyl, metamizol, ketoprofen, or ketamine.
Mean time of methadone treatment was 38.3 +/- 27.1 days (range 3-95 days), mean daily doses: start 48.1 +/- 19.7 mg, maximal 148.5 +/- 104.1 mg, treatment completion 131.1 +/- 104.3 mg. Good analgesia (NRS < 4) was observed in 11 patients, partial (NRS 4-5) in nine patients, and unsatisfactory (NRS > 5) in one patient. Adverse effects such as drowsiness (six patients), constipation (six patients), nausea and vomiting (two patients), sweating (two patients), and respiratory depression (one patient) the last one resolved by methadone cessation and naloxone.
Results confirmed high analgesic efficacy, acceptable methadone adverse event profile, safety, and effectiveness of ddom to ddomet dose calculation method.
评估美沙酮的镇痛效果、不良反应以及与口服吗啡等效镇痛剂量的计算方法。
21例阿片类药物耐受的癌症患者因疼痛(数字评分量表[NRS]>5)接受美沙酮治疗,这些患者之前分别使用吗啡(10例)、透皮芬太尼(TF;4例)、吗啡联合氯胺酮以及TF(1例)、曲马多(1例)、哌替啶(1例)、吗啡联合氯胺酮伴嗜睡(3例)、吗啡伴恶心(1例)。口服吗啡等效日剂量(ddom)与口服美沙酮日剂量(ddomet)的剂量比为4:1(ddom对应100mg)、6:1(101 - 300mg)、12:1(301 - 1000mg)和20:1(超过1000mg)。19例患者之前的阿片类药物治疗完全停用(停药 - 启动法);2例患者同时接受美沙酮和其他阿片类药物治疗。换药前的平均ddom为812±486mg。美沙酮每日规律给药3次;20例患者口服美沙酮,1例患者接受直肠栓剂给药。爆发痛采用美沙酮(常规剂量的一半)、吗啡、芬太尼、安乃近、酮洛芬或氯胺酮治疗。
美沙酮治疗的平均时间为38.3±27.1天(范围3 - 95天),平均日剂量:开始时48.1±19.7mg,最大剂量148.5±104.1mg,治疗结束时131.1±104.3mg。11例患者镇痛效果良好(NRS<4),9例患者部分有效(NRS 4 - 5),1例患者效果不佳(NRS>5)。出现的不良反应包括嗜睡(6例)、便秘(6例)、恶心和呕吐(2例)、出汗(2例)以及呼吸抑制(1例),最后1例通过停用美沙酮和使用纳洛酮得到缓解。
结果证实了美沙酮具有高镇痛疗效、可接受的不良反应谱、安全性以及ddom与ddomet剂量计算方法的有效性。