Ketchandji Melanie, Kuo Yong-Fang, Shahinian Vahakn B, Goodwin James S
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jan;57(1):24-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02091.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
To compare survival and cause of death in men aged 65 and older diagnosed with prostate cancer and with survival and cause of death in a noncancer control population.
Retrospective cohort from a population-based tumor registry linked to Medicare claims data.
Eleven regions of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Tumor Registry.
Men aged 65 to 84 (N=208,601) diagnosed with prostate cancer from 1988 through 2002 formed the basis for different analytical cohorts.
Survival as a function of stage and tumor grade (low, Gleason grade<7; moderate, grade=7; and high, grade=8-10) was compared with survival in men without any cancer using Cox proportional hazards regression. Cause of death according to stage and tumor grade were compared using chi-square statistics.
Men with early-stage prostate cancer and with low- to moderate-grade tumors (59.1% of the entire sample) experienced a survival not substantially worse than men without prostate cancer. In those men, cardiovascular disease and other cancers were the leading causes of death.
The excellent survival of older men with early-stage, low- to moderate-grade prostate cancer, along with the patterns of causes of death, implies that this population would be well served by an ongoing focus on screening and prevention of cardiovascular disease and other cancers.
比较65岁及以上被诊断为前列腺癌的男性的生存率和死亡原因,以及非癌症对照人群的生存率和死亡原因。
基于人群的肿瘤登记处与医疗保险索赔数据相链接的回顾性队列研究。
监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)肿瘤登记处的11个地区。
1988年至2002年期间被诊断为前列腺癌的65至84岁男性(N = 208,601)构成了不同分析队列的基础。
使用Cox比例风险回归比较前列腺癌患者按分期和肿瘤分级(低,Gleason分级<7;中,分级 = 7;高,分级 = 8 - 10)的生存率与无癌症男性的生存率。使用卡方统计比较按分期和肿瘤分级的死亡原因。
早期前列腺癌且肿瘤分级为低至中度的男性(占整个样本的59.1%)的生存率并不比无前列腺癌的男性差很多。在这些男性中,心血管疾病和其他癌症是主要死亡原因。
早期、低至中度前列腺癌的老年男性具有良好的生存率,以及死亡原因模式,这意味着持续关注心血管疾病和其他癌症的筛查和预防将使该人群受益。