Pérez-Yarza E G, Badía X, Badiola C, Cobos N, Garde J, Ibero M, Villa J R
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Jan;44(1):54-63. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20929.
To develop and validate a questionnaire to assess asthma control in children (CAN).
Two versions of the CAN (for carers and children) were developed. Both versions were validated in an observational, prospective, multicenter study performed in 38 hospital outpatient clinics throughout Spain. Four hundred fifteen patients and their carers agreed to participate. Of these, 414 patients under 14 years old with frequent episodic or persistent (moderate to severe) asthma completed the questionnaire on 3 occasions (baseline, week 2, and week 12). For patients aged 2-8 the questionnaire was only completed by the carers, but for patients aged 9-14 the questionnaire was completed by the carers and the children. Clinician ratings of asthma control were used as a gold standard to assess the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the new measure.
Evaluable responses were obtained from 215 carers for children aged 2-8 years and 199 children aged 9-14 years, and their parents. Using a questionnaire total score cut-off of 8 the patient version had a sensitivity of 76.3% and a specificity of 62.9%. For carer version these values were 73% and 69.7%, respectively. A cut point of 8 was selected to maximize the screening accuracy of the CAN questionnaire. Effect sizes in patients with clinician-rated improvements in asthma control were 0.33 and 0.57 for the carer and child versions, respectively.
The screening accuracy and validity of the CAN questionnaire make it suitable for use in research and clinical practice. The sensitivity and specificity were close to 70%, which is acceptable for the study objective: obtain a tool to measure the level of asthma control.
开发并验证一份用于评估儿童哮喘控制情况的问卷(儿童哮喘控制问卷,CAN)。
开发了两个版本的CAN(分别供照料者和儿童使用)。两个版本均在西班牙38家医院门诊进行的一项观察性、前瞻性、多中心研究中进行了验证。415名患者及其照料者同意参与。其中,414名14岁以下患有频繁发作性或持续性(中度至重度)哮喘的患者分三次(基线、第2周和第12周)完成了问卷。对于2 - 8岁的患者,问卷仅由照料者完成,但对于9 - 14岁的患者,问卷由照料者和儿童共同完成。以临床医生对哮喘控制的评分作为金标准,评估该新指标的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。
获得了215名2 - 8岁儿童的照料者以及199名9 - 14岁儿童及其父母的可评估回复。问卷总分临界值设定为8分时,患者版的敏感性为76.3%,特异性为62.9%。照料者版的相应值分别为73%和69.7%。选择8作为临界值以最大化CAN问卷的筛查准确性。临床医生评定哮喘控制有改善的患者中,照料者版和儿童版的效应量分别为0.33和0.57。
CAN问卷的筛查准确性和有效性使其适用于研究和临床实践。敏感性和特异性接近70%,对于研究目标(获得一种测量哮喘控制水平的工具)而言是可接受的。