Suppr超能文献

优化药物治疗和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对稳定型心绞痛患者的影响。

Impact of optimal medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with stable angina.

作者信息

Latib Azeem, Chieffo Alaide, Colombo Antonio

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2009 Feb;6(2):92-3. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1422. Epub 2008 Dec 9.

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not associated with reduction in risk of death or myocardial infarction in patients who have chronic stable angina with normal left ventricular function and moderate coronary artery disease. A substudy of the COURAGE trial has shown that both PCI plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) and OMT alone result in marked improvements in quality of life and angina, but that PCI can substantially benefit patients with more-severe and more-frequent angina. A number of caveats to this study exist, including the extent to which the findings can be applied to the general patient population and the large proportion of patients who had mild angina or were asymptomatic--it is difficult to make these patients feel better. In addition, the remarkable commitment of both healthcare providers and patients in this study would be hard to achieve in clinical practice. Nevertheless, for patients with mild or no angina and no significant ischemia on stress testing, the COURAGE trial reassures us that OMT alone can be efficacious in reducing angina and/or improving quality of life.

摘要

对于左心室功能正常且患有中度冠状动脉疾病的慢性稳定型心绞痛患者,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与降低死亡风险或心肌梗死风险无关。“临床治疗心绞痛:血管重建术与强化药物治疗对比研究”(COURAGE试验)的一项子研究表明,PCI联合最佳药物治疗(OMT)和单纯OMT均能显著改善生活质量和心绞痛症状,但PCI能使心绞痛更严重、发作更频繁的患者显著受益。这项研究存在一些需要注意的地方,包括研究结果能在多大程度上适用于一般患者群体,以及有很大比例的患者患有轻度心绞痛或无症状——很难让这些患者感觉更好。此外,本研究中医疗服务提供者和患者的显著投入在临床实践中很难实现。尽管如此,对于轻度心绞痛或无心绞痛且在负荷试验中无明显缺血的患者,COURAGE试验让我们放心,单纯OMT在减轻心绞痛和/或改善生活质量方面可能有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验