Puig-Ribera Anna, McKenna Jim, Gilson Nicholas, Brown Wendy J
Universitat de Vic, Catalonia, Spain.
Promot Educ. 2008 Dec;15(4):11-6. doi: 10.1177/1025382308097693.
Using a randomised controlled trial design, this feasibility study assessed the impact of two walking interventions on quality of life (QoL) and job performance of Catalan university employees. A convenience sample of 70 employees completed baseline and intervention measures of step counts (Yamax SW 200 pedometer), wellbeing (SF-12 questionnaire) and work performance (Work Limitations Questionnaire) over 9 weeks. Before intervention, baseline step counts (five working days) were used to randomly allocate participants to a control (n = 26), "walking routes" (n = 19) and "walking while working" (n = 25) groups. Intervention effects were evaluated by calculating differences between pre-intervention and intervention data. One-way ANOVA was used to examine differences between groups. No significant group differences were found for changes in work-day step counts, QoL or work performance. When data from the two intervention groups were pooled (n = 44) there was a significant increase in step counts (+659 steps/day; n = 12; p < 0.01) among participants classified as ;Sedentary-Low active' (0-7499 steps/day) at baseline. In contrast there was a significant decrease (-637 steps/day; p < 0.05) in those initially categorised as ;Active' (> 10,000 steps/day; n = 21) and no change in those categorised as ;Moderately Active' (7500-9999, n = 11). The ;Sedentary-Low activity' group showed consistently greater improvements in QoL and work performance scores than the Moderate and Active groups. Initially low active participants showed the greatest increase in step counts and improved QoL and work productivity profiles. These data indicate the potential for improving QoL and job productivity through workplace walking in inactive Catalan employees.
本可行性研究采用随机对照试验设计,评估了两种步行干预措施对加泰罗尼亚大学员工生活质量(QoL)和工作绩效的影响。70名员工的便利样本在9周内完成了步数(Yamax SW 200计步器)、幸福感(SF-12问卷)和工作绩效(工作限制问卷)的基线和干预测量。干预前,使用基线步数(五个工作日)将参与者随机分配到对照组(n = 26)、“步行路线”组(n = 19)和“工作时步行”组(n = 25)。通过计算干预前和干预数据之间的差异来评估干预效果。使用单因素方差分析来检验组间差异。在工作日步数、生活质量或工作绩效的变化方面未发现显著的组间差异。当将两个干预组的数据合并(n = 44)时,基线时被归类为“久坐-低活动量”(每天0 - 7499步)的参与者步数显著增加(每天增加659步;n = 12;p < 0.01)。相比之下,最初被归类为“活跃”(每天> 10,000步;n = 21)的参与者步数显著减少(每天减少637步;p < 0.05),而被归类为“中度活跃”(7500 - 9999步;n = 11)的参与者步数没有变化。“久坐-低活动量”组在生活质量和工作绩效得分上的改善始终大于中度和活跃组。最初活动量低的参与者步数增加最多,生活质量和工作生产率状况得到改善。这些数据表明,通过在工作场所步行,有可能改善加泰罗尼亚不活跃员工 的生活质量和工作生产率。