Veeramootoo Darmarajah, Parameswaran Rajeev, Krishnadas Rakesh, Froeschle Peter, Cooper Martin, Berrisford Richard G, Wajed Shahjehan A
Department of Thoracic and Upper GI Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):2110-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0233-1. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure, with significant morbidity resulting from gastric conduit failure. Early recognition and management of these complications is essential. This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of routine investigations after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) and to propose a classification system for gastric conduit failure.
For esophagogastric resection, MIO is the procedure of choice in the authors' unit. Standard postoperative care similar to that for open esophagectomy is undertaken on a specialist ward. Routine investigations include daily assessment of C-reactive protein (CRP), white cell count (WCC), and a contrast swallow on postoperative day (POD) 5. The authors performed a retrospective analysis to assess the utility of these tests.
Of a prospective cohort of 50 patients from April 2004 to July 2006, 26 (52%) had an uneventful recovery (U), 24 (48%) experienced complications (C) of varying nature and severity, and 1 died (2%). All the patients demonstrated a transient abnormal rise in CRP until POD 3. In group U, the levels then fell, but in group C, they remained elevated (POD 5: U = 96, C = 180; p < 0.01). This discrepancy trend was further exaggerated in the nine patients with gastric conduit failure (POD 5: GC = 254; p < 0.01), whereas contrast swallow failed to identify this complication in six patients. Simple anastomotic leaks (type 1, n = 4) were managed conservatively. Patients with conduit tip necrosis (type 2, n = 3) and complete conduit ischemia (type 2, n = 2) were managed by repeat thoracotomy and either refashioning of the conduit or take-down and cervical esophagostomy. None of the patients with conduit failure died.
Postoperative CRP monitoring is a highly effective, simple method for the early recognition of gastric conduit failure. This new system of classification provides a successful guide to conservative management or revisional surgery.
食管切除术是一项高风险手术,胃代食管失败会导致严重的并发症。早期识别和处理这些并发症至关重要。本研究旨在探讨微创食管切除术后(MIO)常规检查的临床价值,并提出胃代食管失败的分类系统。
在作者所在科室,MIO是食管胃切除术的首选术式。在专科病房进行与开放食管切除术类似的标准术后护理。常规检查包括每日评估C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞计数(WCC),并在术后第5天进行上消化道造影。作者进行了一项回顾性分析,以评估这些检查的效用。
在2004年4月至2006年7月的50例前瞻性队列患者中,26例(52%)恢复顺利(U组),24例(48%)出现了不同性质和严重程度的并发症(C组),1例死亡(2%)。所有患者在术后第3天前CRP均出现短暂异常升高。在U组中,随后CRP水平下降,但在C组中,其仍保持升高(术后第5天:U组=96,C组=180;p<0.01)。在9例胃代食管失败的患者中,这种差异趋势进一步扩大(术后第5天:胃代食管失败组=254;p<0.01),而上消化道造影未能在6例患者中识别出该并发症。简单的吻合口漏(1型,n=4)采用保守治疗。导管尖端坏死患者(2型,n=3)和完全导管缺血患者(2型,n=2)通过再次开胸手术,要么对导管进行重新塑形,要么拆除导管并进行颈部食管造口术。胃代食管失败的患者均未死亡。
术后CRP监测是早期识别胃代食管失败的一种高效、简单的方法。这种新的分类系统为保守治疗或修复手术提供了成功的指导。