Suppr超能文献

间歇性和长期使用镇静催眠药。

Intermittent and long-term use of sedative hypnotics.

作者信息

Perlis Michael, Gehrman Philip, Riemann Dieter

机构信息

Penn Behavioral Sleep Medicine Program, Suite 670, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia PA, USA.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(32):3456-65. doi: 10.2174/138161208786549290.

Abstract

In this review, the context and evidence base for intermittent and long term dosing with hypnotics is critically evaluated. The context provided includes addressing two questions: "why has long term or maintenance therapy not been a standard for practice for the treatment of chronic insomnia?"; and "why is intermittent dosing thought to represent a potential solution for the problem of chronic insomnia?". The data from the systematic review suggests, over all, that: 1) while intermittent dosing can be conducted without resulting in rebound insomnia on non-med nights, there is insufficient data to show that the strategy is equal, or superior, to nightly dosing on a long term basis; 2) long term therapy (up to 6 months) with intermittent or nightly dosing appears viable to the extent that clinical outcomes are stable over time and occur in the absence of dose escalation or increased adverse events. The discussion section of the review includes: an analysis of the future prospects for intermittent dosing (with or without placebos); the suggestion that the use of placebos in an intermittent dosing regimen presages the use of partial reinforcement principles to enhance the safety and efficacy of the approach; finally the discussion contains a challenge to re-think, from first principles, whether the underlying approach to the medical management of insomnia is rational. It is suggested that a more rational approach is possible and that medical therapy for insomnia needs to be re-assessed for it's curative (vs palliative) potential.

摘要

在本综述中,对催眠药物间歇性和长期给药的背景及证据基础进行了批判性评估。所提供的背景包括回答两个问题:“为何长期或维持治疗尚未成为慢性失眠治疗的标准做法?”以及“为何间歇性给药被认为是慢性失眠问题的一种潜在解决方案?”。系统综述的数据总体表明:1)虽然间歇性给药在非用药夜间不会导致反弹性失眠,但没有足够数据表明该策略在长期效果上等同于或优于每晚给药;2)间歇性或每晚给药的长期治疗(长达6个月)在临床结果随时间稳定且不存在剂量递增或不良事件增加的情况下似乎是可行的。综述的讨论部分包括:对间歇性给药(有无安慰剂)未来前景的分析;认为在间歇性给药方案中使用安慰剂预示着运用部分强化原则来提高该方法的安全性和有效性;最后,讨论对从基本原则重新思考失眠药物治疗的潜在方法是否合理提出了挑战。有人认为可能存在更合理的方法,并且需要重新评估失眠药物治疗的治愈(相对于姑息)潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验