O'Connor Kevin M, Davis Niall, Lennon Gerry M, Quinlan David M, Mulvin David W
Department of Urology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
BJU Int. 2009 Jun;103(11):1492-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08275.x. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
OBJECTIVE To determine the safety of surveillance for localized contrast-enhancing renal masses in elderly patients whose comorbidities precluded invasive management; to provide an insight into the natural history of small enhancing renal masses; and to aid the clinician in identifying those patients who are most suitable for a non-interventional approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of 26 consecutive patients (16 men and 10 women), who were followed for > or =1 year, with localized solid enhancing renal masses between 1998 and 2006. These patients were unfit or unwilling to undergo radical or partial nephrectomy. None had their tumours surgically removed. Study variables included age, presentation, tumour size, growth rate, Charlson comorbidity index (CMI) and available pathological data. RESULTS The mean (range) patient age was 78.14 (63-89) year, with a mean follow-up of 28.1 (12-72) months. The mean tumour size was 4.25 (2.5-8.7) cm at diagnosis. The tumour growth rate was 0.44 cm/year; among smaller masses (T1a) it was 0.15 cm/year, vs 0.64 cm/year in the larger masses (T1b and T2). The mean CMI was 2.96. There were 11 deaths overall; 10 patients died from unrelated illnesses. One death was directly attributable to metastatic renal cancer; this patient had an initial tumour diameter of 5.4 cm and a CMI of 6. All patients who died had a CMI of > or =3. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients with small renal tumours (T1a) and comorbidity scores of > or =3 were more likely to die as a result of their comorbidities rather than the renal tumour. Surveillance of small renal masses appears to be a safe alternative in elderly patients who are poor surgical candidates, where the overall growth rate appears to be slow.
目的 确定对合并症使侵入性治疗受限的老年患者局部增强的肾肿块进行监测的安全性;深入了解小的增强性肾肿块的自然病史;并帮助临床医生识别最适合非介入性治疗方法的患者。患者与方法 我们对1998年至2006年间连续26例(16例男性和10例女性)随访时间≥1年、有局部实性增强肾肿块的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。这些患者不适合或不愿意接受根治性或部分肾切除术。所有患者均未接受肿瘤手术切除。研究变量包括年龄、临床表现、肿瘤大小、生长速度、Charlson合并症指数(CMI)和可用的病理数据。结果 患者的平均(范围)年龄为78.14(63 - 89)岁,平均随访时间为28.1(12 - 72)个月。诊断时肿瘤的平均大小为4.25(2.5 - 8.7)cm。肿瘤生长速度为0.44 cm/年;在较小肿块(T1a)中为0.15 cm/年,而在较大肿块(T1b和T2)中为0.64 cm/年。平均CMI为2.96。总共有11例死亡;10例患者死于无关疾病。1例死亡直接归因于转移性肾癌;该患者初始肿瘤直径为5.4 cm,CMI为6。所有死亡患者的CMI均≥3。结论 患有小肾肿瘤(T1a)且合并症评分≥3的老年患者更有可能因合并症而非肾肿瘤死亡。对小肾肿块进行监测似乎是手术候选性差的老年患者的一种安全选择,这些患者的总体生长速度似乎较慢。