Suppr超能文献

即刻/早期使用 Neoss 种植体修复上颌和下颌后牙区:一项为期 18 个月的前瞻性病例系列研究。

Immediate/Early function of Neoss implants placed in maxillas and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective case series study.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 May;12 Suppl 1:e83-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00135.x. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of studies show that immediate/early function of dental implants can be as successful as two-stage procedures. However, the results may not be universal for all implant types and it is important that new implants are tested for this treatment modality.

PURPOSE

The aim was to evaluate an immediate/early function protocol in the maxilla and in the posterior mandible using Neoss implants (Neoss Ltd., Harrogate, UK).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 21 patients were provided with 69 Neoss implants (4 mm in diameter and 9-15 mm in length) and a provisional bridge within 7 days (mean 4.6 days). Sixteen implants were placed in immediate extraction sites where seven were treated with autologous bone grafts (n = 6) or bone grafts + resorbable membrane (n = 1). A final fixed prosthesis was made 3 to 6 months later. The patients were followed-up with clinical examinations for 18 months. In addition, the implants were monitored with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements at surgery and after 1, 2, and 6 months. Intraoral radiographs were taken after surgery and after 1, 6, and 18 months.

RESULTS

One implant in an extraction site in the maxilla failed after 1 month, giving a survival rate of 98.5% after 18 months. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.7 mm (SD 0.7) after 18 months. RFA showed a mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) value of 68.1 (SD 8.8) at surgery, which increased to 73.7 (SD 5.7) after 6 months. The primary stability for maxillary and mandibular implants was similar, although mandibular implants showed slightly higher values with time. Implants in extraction sockets showed a lower initial stability than in healed sites, ISQ 65.8 (SD 7.5), which increased to ISQ 67.5 (SD 6.9) after 6 months. The failed implant showed an ISQ of 74 at placement, which decreased to 42 1 month after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the present study, it is concluded that immediate/early function with Neoss implants is a reliable method with an implant survival rate comparable to that of the traditional two-stage protocol.

摘要

背景

越来越多的研究表明,即刻/早期功能的种植牙与两阶段手术一样成功。然而,并非所有种植体类型都适用这种结果,因此有必要对新型种植体进行这种治疗方式的测试。

目的

本研究旨在评估使用 Neoss 种植体(Neoss Ltd.,Harrogate,英国)进行即刻/早期功能的上颌和下颌后牙种植体的效果。

材料和方法

21 名患者共植入 69 颗 Neoss 种植体(直径 4 毫米,长 9-15 毫米)和临时桥,植入时间在拔牙后 7 天内(平均 4.6 天)。16 颗种植体即刻植入拔牙窝,其中 7 颗种植体分别接受自体骨移植(n=6)或骨移植+可吸收膜(n=1)治疗。3-6 个月后再制作最终固定修复体。患者接受临床检查随访 18 个月。此外,在手术时和术后 1、2、6 个月用共振频率分析(RFA)测量种植体。术后、术后 1、6 和 18 个月拍摄口腔内 X 光片。

结果

上颌拔牙窝内的 1 颗种植体在术后 1 个月失败,18 个月后存活率为 98.5%。18 个月后,平均边缘骨吸收量为 0.7 毫米(标准差 0.7)。RFA 显示手术时平均种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)值为 68.1(标准差 8.8),6 个月后增加至 73.7(标准差 5.7)。上颌和下颌种植体的初始稳定性相似,但下颌种植体的稳定性随时间略有增加。拔牙窝内的种植体初始稳定性低于愈合部位,ISQ 为 65.8(标准差 7.5),6 个月后增加至 ISQ 67.5(标准差 6.9)。失败的种植体在植入时的 ISQ 为 74,术后 1 个月降至 42。

结论

在本研究的限制范围内,可以得出结论,使用 Neoss 种植体即刻/早期功能是一种可靠的方法,种植体存活率与传统两阶段方案相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验