Kato Dental Clinic, Implant Center, Osaka 584-0093, Japan.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):48-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00129.x. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
Orthodontic forces for tooth intrusion ought to be continuous and low, which may be achieved with the help of osseointegrated implants.
The aims of this study were to describe a method to intrude supererupted maxillary molars using interarch intrusion mechanics (a bite plane appliance) with implants and to assess anchor implant stability through resonance frequency analysis (RFA; Osstell, Mentor version 2, Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) in comparison with nonanchorage control implants during orthodontic intrusion.
A 48-year-old female patient was treated with implants (36 and 37 regions, Brånemark Implant System, MkIII TiUNite, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden; lengths, 13 and 10 mm; diameter, 5 mm) serving as orthodontic anchorage for intrusion of supraerupted teeth in the maxilla (teeth 26 and 27) using a bite plane appliance. The force of intrusion applied was individual discontinuous bite force in the present case. The control implants were in the sites 45, 46, and 47 with healing abutments out of loading. Stability of both the anchorage and control implants was assessed by RFA from the commencement of orthodontic intrusion (7 months after the first-stage surgery) to the end of the study (19 months after the first-stage surgery). Marginal bone height measurements of both implants were performed on radiographs at the same time.
The treatment was completed without complications or abnormalities of the intruded teeth or the opposite anchorage implants. However, implant stability quotient values of the anchored implants obviously changed during the initial 4 months after commencement of intrusion compared with control implants. In the present case, an intrusion of 2.2 mm was achieved in 12 months.
The present method made it possible to intrude molars successfully. However, further studies with more cases are needed to clarify the reliability of the method and determine how to control the bite forces applied as orthodontic load.
牙齿内收的正畸力应该是持续且低的,这可以借助骨整合种植体来实现。
本研究旨在描述一种使用种植体支抗的上下颌内收磨牙的方法,并通过共振频率分析(RFA;Osstell,Mentor 版本 2,Integration Diagnostics AB,哥德堡,瑞典)评估在正畸内收过程中锚定种植体稳定性与非锚定对照种植体的比较。
一位 48 岁的女性患者接受了种植体(36 和 37 区,Brånemark 种植系统,MkIII TiUNite,诺贝尔生物公司,哥德堡,瑞典;长度 13 和 10 毫米;直径 5 毫米)治疗,作为上颌(26 和 27 牙)超牙列牙齿内收的正畸支抗,使用牙合平面矫治器。本病例中应用的内收力为间断的个体牙合力。对照种植体位于 45、46 和 47 区,愈合基台不承受负荷。从正畸内收开始(第一阶段手术后 7 个月)到研究结束(第一阶段手术后 19 个月),通过 RFA 评估了支抗和对照种植体的稳定性。同时在放射影像上测量了两个种植体的边缘骨高度。
治疗过程顺利,无并发症,被内收的牙齿和对侧支抗种植体也无异常。然而,与对照种植体相比,在开始内收后的最初 4 个月内,锚定种植体的稳定性指数值明显改变。在本病例中,12 个月内实现了 2.2 毫米的内收。
本方法可成功内收磨牙。然而,需要更多病例的进一步研究来阐明该方法的可靠性,并确定如何控制作为正畸负荷的牙合力。