Suppr超能文献

α干扰素诱导及小剂量维持治疗毛细胞白血病的长期随访

Long-term follow-up of interferon-alpha induction and low-dose maintenance therapy in hairy cell leukemia.

作者信息

Benz Rudolf, Siciliano Raffaele Daniele, Stussi Georg, Fehr Jörg

机构信息

Clinic for Haematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Münsterlingen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Haematol. 2009 Mar;82(3):194-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2008.01190.x. Epub 2008 Dec 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) was the first effective pharmacologic treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL). Since 1990 purine analogs replaced IFNalpha because of higher rates of complete remission and an invariable disease recurrence after cessation of IFNalpha. However, there are only limited data about long-term maintenance treatment with IFNalpha and none about dose finding in this phase.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive patients treated at our institution for HCL are included in this retrospective analysis. Forty (77%) patients received IFNalpha and 35 patients continue on long-term IFNalpha maintenance therapy. The initial dose of IFNalpha was 3 Mio IU three times per week and was tapered 6 months after initiation to doses as low as 3 Mio IU/12 wk. Dose adaptation was performed by repeated measurement of soluble Interleukin 2 receptor (sIL2R) together with peripheral blood values.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of patients in the long-term IFNalpha group was 13.6 +/- 7.5 yr. Long-term IFNalpha was in general well tolerated and only in six (17%) patients the treatment had to be changed to purine analogs in the long-term IFNalpha group because of side effects. There are no deaths directly related to HCL.

CONCLUSIONS

IFNalpha is still an effective and well tolerated therapeutic option. By repeated measurements of sIL2R together with the peripheral blood values, IFNalpha doses can be tapered to the minimal effective dose. The advantages and disadvantage of IFNalpha in regards to the standard treatment in HCL patients are discussed.

摘要

目的

α干扰素(IFNα)是毛细胞白血病(HCL)的首个有效药物治疗方法。自1990年以来,由于嘌呤类似物的完全缓解率更高,且IFNα停药后疾病复发率恒定,因此取代了IFNα。然而,关于IFNα长期维持治疗的数据有限,且在此阶段尚无剂量探索方面的数据。

患者与方法

本回顾性分析纳入了在我们机构接受治疗的52例连续性HCL患者。40例(77%)患者接受了IFNα治疗,35例患者继续接受IFNα长期维持治疗。IFNα的初始剂量为每周三次,每次300万国际单位,开始治疗6个月后逐渐减量至低至每12周300万国际单位的剂量。通过重复测量可溶性白细胞介素2受体(sIL2R)以及外周血值来进行剂量调整。

结果

长期IFNα组患者的中位随访时间为13.6±7.5年。长期IFNα总体耐受性良好,在长期IFNα组中,仅有6例(17%)患者因副作用而不得不长期将治疗改为嘌呤类似物。没有直接与HCL相关的死亡病例。

结论

IFNα仍然是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择。通过重复测量sIL2R以及外周血值,可以将IFNα剂量逐渐减至最小有效剂量。讨论了IFNα相对于HCL患者标准治疗的优缺点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验