Menza M, Dobkin R D, Marin H, Mark M H, Gara M, Buyske S, Bienfait K, Dicke A
Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, UMDNJ-University Behavioral Health Care, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Neurology. 2009 Mar 10;72(10):886-92. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000336340.89821.b3. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
Parkinson disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease affecting up to 1 million individuals in the United States. Depression affects up to 50% of these patients and is associated with a variety of poor outcomes for patients and their families. Despite this, there are few evidence-based data to guide clinical care.
An NIH-funded, randomized, controlled trial of paroxetine CR, nortriptyline, and placebo in 52 patients with PD and depression. The primary outcomes were the change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the percentage of depression responders at 8 weeks.
Nortriptyline was superior to placebo for the change in HAM-D (p < 0.002); paroxetine CR was not. There was a trend for superiority of nortriptyline over paroxetine CR at 8 weeks (p < 0.079). Response rates favored nortriptyline (p = 0.024): nortriptyline 53%, paroxetine CR 11%, placebo 24%. In planned contrasts of response rates, nortriptyline was superior to paroxetine CR (p = 0.034). Nortriptyline was also superior to placebo in many of the secondary outcomes, including sleep, anxiety, and social functioning, while paroxetine CR was not. Both active drug treatments were well tolerated.
Though relatively modest in size, this is the largest placebo-controlled trial done to date in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and depression. Nortriptyline was efficacious in the treatment of depression and paroxetine CR was not. When compared directly, nortriptyline produced significantly more responders than did paroxetine CR. The trial suggests that depression in patients with PD is responsive to treatment and raises questions about the relative efficacy of dual reuptake inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
帕金森病(PD)是一种常见的神经退行性疾病,在美国影响多达100万人。抑郁症影响高达50%的这些患者,并与患者及其家庭的各种不良后果相关。尽管如此,几乎没有循证数据来指导临床护理。
一项由美国国立卫生研究院资助的、针对52例帕金森病伴抑郁症患者的帕罗西汀控释片、去甲替林和安慰剂的随机对照试验。主要结局指标为汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)的变化以及8周时抑郁缓解者的百分比。
去甲替林在HAM-D变化方面优于安慰剂(p < 0.002);帕罗西汀控释片则不然。在8周时,去甲替林有优于帕罗西汀控释片的趋势(p < 0.079)。缓解率方面去甲替林更具优势(p = 0.024):去甲替林为53%,帕罗西汀控释片为11%,安慰剂为24%。在缓解率的计划对比中,去甲替林优于帕罗西汀控释片(p = 0.034)。在许多次要结局指标上,包括睡眠、焦虑和社交功能,去甲替林也优于安慰剂,而帕罗西汀控释片则不然。两种活性药物治疗的耐受性均良好。
尽管规模相对较小,但这是迄今为止针对帕金森病(PD)伴抑郁症患者开展的最大规模的安慰剂对照试验。去甲替林对抑郁症治疗有效,而帕罗西汀控释片则无效。直接比较时,去甲替林产生的缓解者明显多于帕罗西汀控释片。该试验表明帕金森病患者的抑郁症对治疗有反应,并引发了关于双重再摄取抑制剂和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂相对疗效的问题。