Harloff A, Albrecht F, Spreer J, Stalder A F, Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Schöllhorn J, Hetzel A, Schumacher M, Hennig J, Markl M
Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jan;61(1):65-74. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21774.
To determine three-dimensional (3D) blood flow patterns in the carotid bifurcation, 10 healthy volunteers and nine patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis > or =50% were examined by flow-sensitive 4D MRI at 3T. Absolute and mean blood velocities, pulsatility index (PI), and resistance index (RI) were measured in the common carotid arteries (CCAs) by duplex sonography (DS) and compared with flow-sensitive 4D MRI. Furthermore, 3D MRI blood flow patterns in the carotid bifurcation of volunteers and patients before and after recanalization were graded by two independent readers. Blood flow velocities measured by MRI were 31-39% lower than in DS. However, PI and RI differed by only 13-16%. Rating of 3D flow characteristics in the ICA revealed consistent patterns for filling and helical flow in volunteers. In patients with ICA stenosis, 3D blood flow visualization was successfully employed to detect markedly altered filling and helical flow patterns (forward-moving spiral flow) in the ICA bulb and to evaluate the effect of revascularization, which restored filling and helical flow. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of flow-sensitive 4D MRI for the quantification and 3D visualization of physiological and pathological flow patterns in the carotid artery bifurcation.
为了确定颈动脉分叉处的三维(3D)血流模式,对10名健康志愿者和9名颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄≥50%的患者进行了3T的血流敏感4D MRI检查。通过双功超声(DS)测量颈总动脉(CCA)的绝对和平均血流速度、搏动指数(PI)和阻力指数(RI),并与血流敏感4D MRI进行比较。此外,由两名独立的阅片者对志愿者和再通前后患者的颈动脉分叉处的3D MRI血流模式进行分级。MRI测量的血流速度比DS测量的低31%-39%。然而,PI和RI仅相差13%-16%。对ICA中3D血流特征的评级显示,志愿者中存在一致的充盈和螺旋血流模式。在ICA狭窄患者中,3D血流可视化成功用于检测ICA球部明显改变的充盈和螺旋血流模式(向前移动的螺旋血流),并评估血管重建的效果,血管重建恢复了充盈和螺旋血流。我们的结果证明了血流敏感4D MRI在量化和3D可视化颈动脉分叉处生理和病理血流模式方面的可行性。