Manvikar Sridhar R, Allen David, Steel David H W
Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.09.020.
To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using optical biometry in patients having combined phacovitrectomy for macular hole and macular pucker.
Sunderland Eye Infirmary, North East England, United Kingdom.
This single-surgeon retrospective case series review comprised eyes having combined narrow-gauge phacovitrectomy for macular hole or macular pucker. Intraocular lens power was calculated using the results of optical biometry and the Haigis formula. Achieved and planned refraction were compared to calculate the mean postoperative refractive prediction error (ME) and the mean absolute postoperative prediction error (MAE) and the percentage of eyes with an achieved refraction within +/-0.50 diopter (D) and +/-1.00 D of the planned refraction. The results were compared with those in a series of 42 eyes that had phacoemulsification after previous vitrectomy surgery and a series of 60 nonvitrectomized eyes that had uneventful phacoemulsification.
Of the of 59 having combined phacovitrectomy, 39 had macular hole and 20 had macular pucker. There was no statistically significant difference in refractive outcomes between the phacovitrectomy group (ME -0.02, MAE 0.39) and the sequential phacoemulsification group (ME -0.10, MAE 0.38) (P = .82). There was a statistically significant difference between the phacovitrectomy group and the phacoemulsification-only group (ME 0.08, MAE 0.26) (P<.001).
The use of optical noncontact biometry with the Haigis formula achieved a high degree of accuracy of IOL power estimation in patients having phacovitrectomy. There was no tendency toward a myopic shift, as has been reported using ultrasound axial length measurement.
评估在黄斑裂孔和黄斑皱襞联合晶状体玻璃体切除术患者中使用光学生物测量法计算人工晶状体(IOL)度数的准确性。
英国英格兰东北部桑德兰眼科医院。
本单术者回顾性病例系列研究纳入了因黄斑裂孔或黄斑皱襞接受窄通道晶状体玻璃体联合切除术的眼睛。使用光学生物测量结果和Haigis公式计算人工晶状体度数。比较实际屈光和计划屈光,以计算术后平均屈光预测误差(ME)、术后平均绝对预测误差(MAE)以及实际屈光在计划屈光±0.50屈光度(D)和±1.00 D范围内的眼睛百分比。将结果与42只曾接受玻璃体切除术后行超声乳化术的眼睛以及60只未行玻璃体切除术且超声乳化术过程顺利的眼睛的系列研究结果进行比较。
在59例行晶状体玻璃体联合切除术的患者中,39例有黄斑裂孔,20例有黄斑皱襞。晶状体玻璃体切除术组(ME -0.02,MAE 0.39)和序贯超声乳化术组(ME -0.10,MAE 0.38)之间的屈光结果无统计学显著差异(P = 0.82)。晶状体玻璃体切除术组和单纯超声乳化术组之间存在统计学显著差异(ME 0.08,MAE 0.26)(P < 0.001)。
在接受晶状体玻璃体切除术的患者中,使用光学非接触生物测量法结合Haigis公式可实现较高的人工晶状体度数估算准确性。与使用超声眼轴长度测量所报道的情况不同,未出现近视漂移倾向。