Dubowsky Sarah R, Sisto Sue Ann, Langrana Noshir A
Rehabilitation Engineering Analysis Laboratory, Human Performance and Movement Analysis Laboratory, Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Center, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA.
J Biomech Eng. 2009 Feb;131(2):021015. doi: 10.1115/1.2900726.
A systematic integrated data collection and analysis of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography (EMG) data allow for the comparison of differences in wheelchair propulsion between able-bodied individuals and persons with paraplegia. Kinematic data from a motion analysis system, kinetic data from force-sensing push rims, and electromyography data from four upper-limb muscles were collected for ten push strokes. Results are as follows: Individuals with paraplegia use a greater percentage of their posterior deltoids, biceps, and triceps in relation to maximal voluntary contraction. These persons also reached peak anterior deltoid firing nearly 10 deg earlier on the push rim, while reaching peak posterior deltoid nearly 10 deg later on the push rim. Able-bodied individuals had no triceps activity in the initial stages of propulsion while their paraplegic groups had activity throughout. Able-bodied participants also had, on average, peak resultant, tangential, and radial forces occurring later on the push rim (in degrees). There are two main conclusions that can be drawn from this integrative investigation: (1) A greater "muscle energy," as measured by the area under the curve of the percentage of EMG throughout propulsion, results in a greater resultant joint force in the shoulder and elbow, thus potentially resulting in shoulder pathology. (2) Similarly, a greater muscle energy may result in fatigue and play a factor in the development of shoulder pain and pathology over time; fatigue may compromise an effective propulsive stroke placing undue stresses on the joint capsule. Muscle activity differences may be responsible for the observed kinematic and kinetic differences between the two groups. The high incidence of shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users as compared to the general population may be the result of such differences, although the results from this biomedical investigation should be examined with caution. Future research into joint forces may shed light on this. Further investigation needs to focus on whether the pattern of kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity during wheelchair propulsion is compensatory or evolutionary by tracking individuals longitudinally.
对运动学、动力学和肌电图(EMG)数据进行系统的综合数据收集与分析,有助于比较健全个体与截瘫患者在轮椅推进方面的差异。收集了来自运动分析系统的运动学数据、来自力感应推圈的动力学数据以及来自四块上肢肌肉的肌电图数据,共进行了十次推进行程。结果如下:截瘫患者在最大自主收缩时,后三角肌、肱二头肌和肱三头肌的使用比例更高。这些人在推圈上三角肌前束达到峰值放电的时间比健全个体早近10度,而后束达到峰值放电的时间比健全个体晚近10度。健全个体在推进初始阶段肱三头肌无活动,而截瘫组在整个过程中均有活动。健全参与者在推圈上(以度数计)平均出现合力、切向力和径向力峰值的时间也较晚。从这项综合研究中可以得出两个主要结论:(1)通过整个推进过程中肌电图百分比曲线下面积测量的更大“肌肉能量”,会导致肩部和肘部的合力更大,从而可能导致肩部病变。(2)同样,更大的肌肉能量可能会导致疲劳,并随着时间的推移在肩部疼痛和病变的发展中起作用;疲劳可能会影响有效的推进行程,给关节囊带来过度压力。两组之间观察到的运动学和动力学差异可能是由肌肉活动差异导致的。与普通人群相比,手动轮椅使用者肩部疼痛的高发生率可能就是这种差异的结果,不过对这项生物医学研究的结果应谨慎审视。未来对关节力的研究可能会阐明这一点。进一步的研究需要通过纵向跟踪个体,关注轮椅推进过程中的运动学、动力学和肌肉活动模式是代偿性的还是进化性的。