Research Department of Language and Communication, University College London, London, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Sep-Oct;44(5):769-83. doi: 10.1080/13682820802546969.
Acquired progressive dysarthria is traditionally assessed, rated, and researched using measures of speech perception and intelligibility. The focus is commonly on the individual with dysarthria and how speech deviates from a normative range. A complementary approach is to consider the features and consequences of dysarthric speech as it is produced as a turn-at-talk in everyday interaction and in particular the ways in which this talk may be identified by its recipient as problematic to understand.
To investigate how dysarthric turns-at-talk in everyday conversation may be problematic to understand. Further, to describe how recipients of dysarthric talk identify the source of problematic understandings to the dysarthric speaker.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Video data of natural conversation from two dyads were selected for this paper. The dyads were video-recorded at home, at 3-monthly intervals, over a maximum period of 18 months. Using the methods of conversation analysis a collection of sequences was identified and transcribed. The sequences were analysed with reference to how the recipients of dysarthric talk, through the use of other-initiations of repair, identified some element of that talk as problematic.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: This work shows how a recipient of a dysarthric talk turn in everyday conversation goes about displaying the problematicity of that turn to its speaker. Whilst displaying that a problem exists with a prior turn, the recipient may have difficulty in knowing what that problem actually is.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: It is proposed that clinicians and researchers should consider the effects of dysarthric speech in interaction. Specifically, the nature of dysarthric troubles and the practices used to signal understanding problems as they occur in everyday interaction should be fully explored. This consideration may have relevance for clinical assessment and intervention.
获得性进行性构音障碍传统上使用言语感知和可理解性的测量方法进行评估、评分和研究。重点通常是构音障碍者的言语,以及言语如何偏离正常范围。另一种互补的方法是考虑构音障碍者在日常互动中产生的言语特征和后果,特别是考虑到接收者如何识别言语理解有问题。
研究日常对话中的构音障碍者的言语如何难以理解。进一步描述接收者如何识别构音障碍者的言语理解有问题的来源。
本文选择了两个二人组自然对话的视频数据。二人组在家庭中进行视频录制,每隔 3 个月一次,最长时间为 18 个月。使用会话分析的方法,确定并转录了一系列序列。通过分析接收者如何通过其他修复启动来识别构音障碍者言语中的某些元素有问题,对这些序列进行了分析。
这项工作展示了日常对话中接收者如何展示构音障碍者言语的问题性。在显示先前的一轮存在问题时,接收者可能难以知道问题实际上是什么。
建议临床医生和研究人员应考虑构音障碍者在互动中的影响。具体来说,应该充分探索构音障碍者的问题性质以及在日常互动中用于信号理解问题的实践。这种考虑可能与临床评估和干预有关。