Rocco Micheal V
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2009 Jan;20(1):1-11.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) sponsored HEMO Study did not demonstrate that an increase in dialysis dose was associated with an improvement in patient mortality rates. Despite this negative result, there is ongoing interest in determining if still higher doses of dialysis may be of benefit to patients receiving chronic hemodialysis therapy. Testing this hypothesis requires the use of more fre-quent hemodialysis and/or a much longer duration for each dialysis session. "Short daily hemodialysis", actually six times per week hemodialysis for 1.5 to 3 hours per session, provides a significant increase in small molecule clearance as measured by urea kinetics. "Long nocturnal daily hemodialysis", actually six times per week hemodialysis for 6-8 hours per session, provides a significant increase in both small and large molecular weight clearance and often alleviates the need to take phosphate binders. Both forms of more frequent dialysis have been shown to improve control of blood pressure. One small randomized trial of nocturnal versus conventional home dialysis showed a decrease in left ventricular (LV) mass at 6 months in the nocturnal arm only. Most clinical trials conducted in these dialysis modalities have been observational trials and have enrolled small numbers of patients. The National Institutes of Health is sponsoring two clinical trials via the Frequent Hemodialysis Network to determine the effect of these two more frequent dialysis modalities on intermediate outcomes. In the short daily study, 250 patients will be randomized to receive either six times per week HD, with a session length of 1.5 to 2.75 hours, or conventional in-center hemodialysis. In the nocturnal study, 150 patients will be randomized to receive either six times per week overnight dialysis, with a session length of at least 6 hours, or conventional home hemodialysis.
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的血液透析(HEMO)研究并未表明透析剂量的增加与患者死亡率的改善相关。尽管有这个负面结果,但人们仍在关注确定更高剂量的透析是否可能对接受慢性血液透析治疗的患者有益。检验这一假设需要使用更频繁的血液透析和/或每次透析疗程更长的时间。“每日短时血液透析”,实际上是每周6次,每次透析1.5至3小时,通过尿素动力学测量,小分子清除率显著提高。“夜间长时间每日血液透析”,实际上是每周6次,每次透析6至8小时,小分子和大分子清除率均显著提高,并且常常减少了服用磷结合剂的需求。两种更频繁的透析方式均已显示可改善血压控制。一项关于夜间透析与传统家庭透析的小型随机试验表明,仅夜间透析组在6个月时左心室(LV)质量有所下降。在这些透析方式中进行的大多数临床试验都是观察性试验且纳入的患者数量较少。美国国立卫生研究院正在通过频繁血液透析网络资助两项临床试验,以确定这两种更频繁的透析方式对中间结局的影响。在每日短时研究中,250名患者将被随机分组,分别接受每周6次、每次透析时长为1.5至2.75小时的血液透析,或传统的中心血液透析。在夜间研究中,150名患者将被随机分组,分别接受每周6次、每次透析时长至少6小时的夜间透析,或传统的家庭血液透析。