Suppr超能文献

[D-二聚体检测在诊断肺栓塞中的应用:单机构研究]

[Utility of D-dimer assay for diagnosing pulmonary embolism: single institute study].

作者信息

Park Rojin, Seo Young Ik, Yoon Soon Gyu, Choi Tae Youn, Shin Jeong Won, Uh Soo-Taek, Kim Yang-Ki

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Lab Med. 2008 Dec;28(6):419-24. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2008.28.6.419.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) presents with diverse non-specific signs and symptoms and its diagnosis mainly depends on diagnostic imaging tests which are laborious and not cost-effective, and only a small proportion of patients with suspected PE actually have the disease. The aim of this study was to analyze the utility of D-dimer test for diagnosing PE by categorizing patients into 'PE likely' and 'PE unlikely' groups using Wells score for clinical probability.

METHODS

One hundred forty consecutive patients with clinically suspected PE, in whom D-dimer and imaging tests were performed were enrolled. Dignosis of PE was made when the imaging tests were positive. Wells scores were retrospectively assigned and the dignostic utility of D-dimer test was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 140 patients studied, D-dimer test was positive in 97 and diagnostic imaging tests revealed PE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and PE+DVT in 24, 3, and 7 patients, respectively. For the diagnosis of PE, D-dimer test with cutoff value of > or =230 ng/mL showed sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of 96.8%, 39.6%, and 97.7%, respectively. These values were 96.3%, 37.9%, and 91.7% in 'PE likely' group (n=56), and 100%, 38.8%, and 100% in 'PE unlikely' group (n=84). Among 43 patients with D-dimer values of <230 ng/mL, only one patient was diagnosed with PE, who belonged to the 'PE likely' group.

CONCLUSIONS

D-dimer test cannot be used as a stand-alone test to diagnose PE, but it can be helpful for exclusion of PE especially in 'PE unlikely' group according to Wells score.

摘要

背景

肺栓塞(PE)表现出多种非特异性体征和症状,其诊断主要依赖于诊断性影像学检查,这些检查费力且不具成本效益,而且只有一小部分疑似PE的患者实际患有该病。本研究的目的是通过使用Wells临床概率评分将患者分为“可能患有PE”和“不太可能患有PE”两组,分析D - 二聚体检测在诊断PE中的效用。

方法

纳入140例临床疑似PE且进行了D - 二聚体和影像学检查的连续患者。当影像学检查呈阳性时诊断为PE。回顾性分配Wells评分并分析D - 二聚体检测的诊断效用。

结果

在研究的140例患者中,97例D - 二聚体检测呈阳性,诊断性影像学检查分别在24例、3例和7例患者中发现PE、深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和PE + DVT。对于PE的诊断,临界值≥230 ng/mL的D - 二聚体检测的敏感性、特异性和阴性预测值分别为96.8%、39.6%和97.7%。在“可能患有PE”组(n = 56)中,这些值分别为96.3%、37.9%和91.7%,在“不太可能患有PE”组(n = 84)中分别为100%、38.8%和100%。在43例D - 二聚体值<230 ng/mL的患者中,只有1例被诊断为PE,该患者属于“可能患有PE”组。

结论

D - 二聚体检测不能作为诊断PE的独立检测方法,但根据Wells评分,它有助于排除PE,尤其是在“不太可能患有PE”组中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验