Suppr超能文献

硝酸钾与Gluma脱敏剂降低全冠修复牙过敏症疗效的比较

A comparison of the efficacy of potassium nitrate and Gluma desensitizer in the reduction of hypersensitivity in teeth with full-crown preparations.

作者信息

Jalalian Ezzatollah, Meraji Naghmeh, Mirzaei Maryam

机构信息

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Azad Dental University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Jan 1;10(1):66-73.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this clinical investigation was to compare the efficacy of Gluma Desensitizer and potassium nitrate desensitizing agents on the reduction of hypersensitivity of teeth prepared for full coverage crowns.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study included 75 vital teeth in 25 patients in need of fixed prosthesis treatment. After completing routine examinations, hypersensitivity of the teeth was measured using an air sensitivity test. The measurement of sensitivity was using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before preparation, after preparation, before using desensitizers, after using desensitizers, and before cementation. Each tooth was randomly put into one of the three groups of 25 teeth according to the desensitizing agent used (potassium nitrate, Gluma, and the control). In each patient potassium nitrate was used on one of the abutments and Gluma was used on the other abutment and on the third abutment (the control) no substance was used.

RESULTS

Both desensitizers decreased dentinal hypersensitivity in vital teeth prepared for full-coverage crowns, but potassium nitrate was more effective when applied before cementation. In 88% of the teeth to which Gluma was applied a vascular pain (with pulse) was present.

CONCLUSION

The results of this investigation suggest the application of potassium nitrate to dentin in full crown preparations prior to cementation reduces post-operative sensitivity.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Clinical experiments show the preparation of vital teeth for full coverage crowns can cause sharp, transient pain as a result of dentinal hypersensitivity in the majority of cases. Several different substances and methods have been suggested for reducing such hypersensitivity including costly laser treatments. However, the findings of this study indicate the use of desensitizer substances such as potassium nitrate can reduce tooth hypersensitivity efficiently with less expense.

摘要

目的

本临床研究旨在比较Gluma脱敏剂和硝酸钾脱敏剂在降低全冠修复预备牙过敏反应方面的疗效。

方法与材料

本研究纳入了25例需要进行固定义齿修复治疗的患者的75颗活髓牙。完成常规检查后,采用空气敏感试验测量牙齿的过敏反应。在预备前、预备后、使用脱敏剂前、使用脱敏剂后以及粘固前,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量敏感度。根据所使用的脱敏剂(硝酸钾、Gluma和对照组),将每颗牙齿随机分为三组,每组25颗牙。在每位患者中,一颗基牙使用硝酸钾,另一颗基牙使用Gluma,第三颗基牙(对照组)不使用任何物质。

结果

两种脱敏剂均能降低全冠修复预备活髓牙的牙本质过敏反应,但硝酸钾在粘固前应用时效果更佳。在使用Gluma的牙齿中,88%出现了血管性疼痛(伴有搏动)。

结论

本研究结果表明,在粘固前对全冠修复预备牙的牙本质应用硝酸钾可降低术后敏感度。

临床意义

临床实验表明,在大多数情况下,为活髓牙制备全冠会因牙本质过敏而导致尖锐、短暂的疼痛。为降低这种过敏反应,已提出了几种不同的物质和方法,包括成本高昂的激光治疗。然而,本研究结果表明,使用硝酸钾等脱敏剂可以以较低的成本有效降低牙齿过敏反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验