DiLallo John J, Jones Meredith, Westen Drew
Child and Family Institute, St. Luke's and Roosevelt Hospitals, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Jan;197(1):15-23. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318192770c.
This study examined whether personality differences might account for meaningful heterogeneity within and across DSM-IV diagnostic categories for disruptive adolescent boys. In a broader study of personality pathology in adolescence, a national sample of 293 clinicians completed the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure 200-A on randomly selected outpatients aged 14 to 18 in their care. Of 138 boys in the sample, 71 had a diagnosis of Disruptive Behavior Disorders or a history of arrests. Q-factor analysis identified 3 personality subtypes within this subsample: psychopathic (n = 28), social outcast (n = 22), and impulsive delinquent (n = 17). The subtypes differed on external criterion variables indicative of a valid taxonomic distinction, notably personality ratings, clinician-report child behavior checklist subscale scores, and etiologic variables. Personality subtypes converged with subtypes of delinquent boys identified by longitudinal research, and they showed substantial incremental validity in predicting adaptive functioning beyond Disruptive Behavior Disorders diagnoses. Results suggest that dimensional personality assessment in disruptive/delinquent adolescent boys provides information beyond existing diagnoses that may prove useful in prevention, clinical conceptualization, and treatment.
本研究探讨了人格差异是否可以解释破坏性行为障碍青少年男孩在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)诊断类别内部及之间存在的有意义的异质性。在一项关于青少年人格病理学的更广泛研究中,来自全国的293名临床医生对他们所护理的随机抽取的14至18岁门诊患者完成了施德勒-韦斯顿评估程序200-A(Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure 200-A)。在样本中的138名男孩中,71名被诊断为破坏性行为障碍或有被捕史。Q因素分析在该子样本中识别出3种人格亚型:精神病态型(n = 28)、社会弃儿型(n = 22)和冲动型违法型(n = 17)。这些亚型在表明有效分类学差异的外部标准变量上存在差异,特别是人格评分、临床医生报告的儿童行为清单子量表得分和病因变量。人格亚型与纵向研究确定的违法男孩亚型一致,并且在预测破坏性行为障碍诊断之外的适应性功能方面显示出显著的增量效度。结果表明,对破坏性行为/违法青少年男孩进行维度人格评估可提供超出现有诊断的信息,这些信息可能在预防、临床概念化和治疗中证明有用。