Evans Catrin, Ndirangu Eunice
School of Nursing, Nottingham University, B Floor, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 May;46(5):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.11.003. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
In 2007 WHO/UNAIDS issued new HIV testing guidelines recommending 'provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling' (PITC). In contrast to existing 'voluntary counselling and testing' guidelines (whereby individuals self refer for testing), the PITC guidance recommends that, in countries with generalised epidemics, all patients are routinely offered an HIV test during clinical encounters. In sub-Saharan Africa, PITC aims to dramatically increase HIV testing rates so that PITC becomes a vehicle to increase access to HIV prevention and care. Nurses in this region work on the frontlines of HIV testing but have been neglected in related policy development.
To provide an overview of the PITC policy guidance and to critically consider its implications for the nursing profession in sub-Saharan Africa.
Policy documents and published and unpublished research were identified from organisational websites, electronic databases and conference proceedings.
PITC has generated widespread debate about whether it is the right approach in a context of HIV-related stigma and lack of human/material resources. Key concerns are whether/how informed consent, privacy and confidentiality will be upheld in overstretched health care settings, and whether appropriate post-test counselling, treatment and support can be provided. Limited available evidence suggests that health systems factors and organisational/professional culture may create obstacles to effective PITC implementation. Specific findings are that: PITC greatly increases nurses' workload and work-related stress. Nurses are generally positive about PITC, but express the need for more training and managerial support. Health system constraints (lack of staff, lack of space) mean that nurses do not always have time to provide adequate counselling. A hierarchical and didactic nursing culture affects counselling quality and the boundaries between voluntary informed consent and coercion can become rather blurred. Nurses are particularly stressed by breaking bad news and handling ethical dilemmas.
Three areas are identified in which the PITC implementation process needs to be strengthened: (i) research/audit (to explore nurse and patient experiences, to identify best practice and key obstacles), (ii) greater nurse participation in policy development, (iii) strengthening of nurse training and mentoring.
2007年,世界卫生组织/联合国艾滋病规划署发布了新的艾滋病毒检测指南,推荐采用“医务人员主动提供艾滋病毒检测与咨询”(PITC)。与现有的“自愿咨询与检测”指南(即个人自行前往检测)不同,PITC指南建议,在艾滋病广泛流行的国家中,所有患者在临床诊疗过程中都应常规接受艾滋病毒检测。在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,PITC旨在大幅提高艾滋病毒检测率,从而使其成为增加获得艾滋病毒预防和治疗服务机会的一种手段。该地区的护士处于艾滋病毒检测的前沿,但在相关政策制定中却被忽视。
概述PITC政策指南,并批判性地思考其对撒哈拉以南非洲地区护理专业的影响。
从组织网站、电子数据库和会议记录中查找政策文件以及已发表和未发表的研究资料。
PITC引发了广泛的争论,即它在存在与艾滋病毒相关的污名以及缺乏人力/物力资源的情况下是否是正确的方法。主要担忧包括在过度紧张的卫生保健环境中能否/如何维护知情同意、隐私和保密原则,以及能否提供适当的检测后咨询、治疗和支持。现有有限的证据表明,卫生系统因素以及组织/专业文化可能会给有效实施PITC带来障碍。具体研究结果如下:PITC极大地增加了护士的工作量和工作压力。护士总体上对PITC持积极态度,但表示需要更多培训和管理支持。卫生系统的限制(人员短缺、空间不足)意味着护士并不总是有时间提供充分的咨询。等级分明且说教式的护理文化会影响咨询质量,自愿知情同意与强制之间的界限可能会变得相当模糊。传达坏消息和处理伦理困境给护士带来了特别大的压力。
确定了需要加强PITC实施过程的三个方面:(i)研究/审计(以探索护士和患者的经历,确定最佳实践和主要障碍),(ii)让护士更多地参与政策制定,(iii)加强护士培训和指导。