Suppr超能文献

损伤机制与颈椎骨折风险的关联

Association of injury mechanism with the risk of cervical spine fractures.

作者信息

Thompson Wendy L, Stiell Ian G, Clement Catherine M, Brison Robert J

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.

出版信息

CJEM. 2009 Jan;11(1):14-22. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500010873.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A full understanding of an injury event and the mechanical forces involved should be important for predicting specific anatomical patterns of injury. Yet, information on the mechanism of injury is often overlooked as a predictor for specific anatomical injury in clinical decision-making. We measured the relationship between mechanism of injury and risk for cervical spine fracture.

METHODS

Our case-control study is a secondary analysis of data collected from the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) study. Data were collected from 1996 to 2002 and included patients presenting to the emergency departments of 9 tertiary care centres after sustaining acute blunt trauma to the head or neck. Cases are defined as patients who were categorized in the CCR study with a clinically important cervical spine fracture. Controls had no radiologic evidence of cervical spine injury. Bivariate and multivariate unconditional logistic regression models were used. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Among the 17,208 patients in the CCR study, 320 (2%)received a diagnosis of a cervical spine fracture. Axial loads, falls, diving incidents and nontraffic motorized vehicle collisions (e.g., collisions involving snowmobiles or all-terrain vehicles) were injury mechanisms that were significantly related to a higher risk of fracture. For motor vehicle collisions, the risk of cervical spine injury increased with the posted speed, being involved in a head-on collision or a rollover, or not wearing a seat belt (p < 0.05). The occurrence of cervical spine fracture was negligible in simple rear-end collisions (1 in 3694 cases; OR 0.015, 95% CI 0.002-0.104]).

CONCLUSION

Our study quantitatively demonstrates the relationship between specific mechanisms of injury and the risk of a cervical spine fracture. A full understanding of the injury mechanism would assist providers of emergency health care in assessing risk for injury in trauma patients.

摘要

目的

全面了解损伤事件及相关机械力对于预测特定的损伤解剖模式应具有重要意义。然而,在临床决策中,损伤机制的信息常被忽视,未能作为特定解剖损伤的预测因素。我们测量了损伤机制与颈椎骨折风险之间的关系。

方法

我们的病例对照研究是对从加拿大颈椎规则(CCR)研究中收集的数据进行的二次分析。数据收集时间为1996年至2002年,包括头部或颈部遭受急性钝性创伤后到9家三级护理中心急诊科就诊的患者。病例定义为在CCR研究中被归类为患有具有临床重要性颈椎骨折的患者。对照组没有颈椎损伤的放射学证据。使用双变量和多变量无条件逻辑回归模型。结果以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。

结果

在CCR研究的17208名患者中,320名(2%)被诊断为颈椎骨折。轴向负荷、跌倒、潜水事故和非交通机动车辆碰撞(如涉及雪地摩托或全地形车的碰撞)是与较高骨折风险显著相关的损伤机制。对于机动车碰撞,颈椎损伤风险随着公布的速度、发生正面碰撞或翻车、或未系安全带而增加(p<0.05)。在简单的追尾碰撞中,颈椎骨折的发生率可忽略不计(3694例中有1例;OR 0.015,95%CI 0.002 - 0.104)。

结论

我们的研究定量地证明了特定损伤机制与颈椎骨折风险之间的关系。全面了解损伤机制将有助于急诊医疗服务提供者评估创伤患者的损伤风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验