Morgenroth David C, Shakir Ali, Orendurff Michael S, Czerniecki Joseph M
From the Rehabilitation Research and Development Center of Excellence in Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington 98108, USA.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Feb;88(2):108-13. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318194fbbc.
Low-back pain (LBP) is an important cause of secondary disability in transfemoral amputees (TFA). The correction of leg-length discrepancy (LLD) is a common clinical approach to the treatment of LBP in this population. The aim of our study is to assess the relationship of static and dynamic LLD and LBP in a sample TFA population.
Nine TFA with LBP and eight TFA without LBP were studied. Static leg length was measured with subjects standing in a self-selected comfortable position. Dynamic leg length was measured during the single-limb support and double-limb support phases of the gait cycle.
There were no statistically significant differences between the pain and no pain groups in terms of static LLD (P = 1.0; 95% confidence interval, -6.8 to 6.6 mm); dynamic LLD during single-limb support (P = 0.3; 95% confidence interval, -27.3 to 7.3 mm); dynamic LLD during double-limb support with either the prosthetic limb leading (P = 0.3; 95% confidence interval, -4.0 to 12.2 mm) or the intact foot leading (P = 0.8, 95% confidence interval, -6.4 to 7.8 mm).
This study calls into question whether LLD plays a significant role in persistence of LBP in TFA. Further study of the effects of LLD and its possible relationship to causation of LBP in amputees is needed.
腰背痛(LBP)是经股截肢者(TFA)继发性残疾的重要原因。纠正腿长差异(LLD)是该人群治疗腰背痛的一种常见临床方法。我们研究的目的是评估一个TFA样本群体中静态和动态LLD与LBP之间的关系。
对9名患有LBP的TFA和8名未患LBP的TFA进行了研究。静态腿长是在受试者站在自选舒适姿势时测量的。动态腿长是在步态周期的单腿支撑和双腿支撑阶段测量的。
在静态LLD方面,疼痛组和无疼痛组之间无统计学显著差异(P = 1.0;95%置信区间,-6.8至6.6毫米);单腿支撑期间的动态LLD(P = 0.3;95%置信区间,-27.3至7.3毫米);假肢腿在前的双腿支撑期间的动态LLD(P = 0.3;95%置信区间,-4.0至12.2毫米)或健侧脚在前的双腿支撑期间的动态LLD(P = 0.8,95%置信区间,-6.4至7.8毫米)。
本研究对LLD在TFA持续性LBP中是否起重要作用提出了质疑。需要进一步研究LLD的影响及其与截肢者LBP病因的可能关系。