Freburger Janet K, Carey Timothy S, Holmes George M, Wallace Andrea S, Castel Liana D, Darter Jane D, Jackman Anne M
The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, USA.
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Feb 15;61(2):192-200. doi: 10.1002/art.24234.
To describe exercise prescription in routine clinical practice for individuals with chronic back or neck pain because, although current practice guidelines promote exercise for chronic back and neck pain, little is known about exercise prescription in routine care.
We conducted a computer-assisted telephone survey of a representative sample of individuals (n = 684) with chronic back or neck pain who saw a physician, chiropractor, and/or physical therapist (PT) in the past 12 months. Individuals were asked about whether they were prescribed exercise, the amount of supervision received, and the type, duration, and frequency of the prescribed exercise. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were conducted.
Of the 684 subjects, 48% were prescribed exercise. Of those prescribed exercise, 46% received the prescription from a PT, 29% from a physician, 21% from a chiropractor, and 4% from other. In multivariable analyses, seeing a PT or a chiropractor were the strongest predictors of exercise prescription. The likelihood of exercise prescription was increased in women, those with higher education, and those receiving worker's compensation. PTs were more likely to provide supervision and prescribe strengthening exercises compared with physicians and chiropractors, and were more likely to prescribe stretching exercises compared with physicians.
Our findings suggest that exercise is being underutilized as a treatment for chronic back and neck pain and, to some extent, that the amount of supervision and types of exercises prescribed do not follow current practice guidelines. Exercise prescription provided by PTs appears to be most in line with current guidelines.
描述针对慢性背痛或颈痛患者的常规临床实践中的运动处方,因为尽管当前的实践指南提倡对慢性背痛和颈痛进行运动治疗,但对于常规护理中的运动处方知之甚少。
我们对过去12个月内看过医生、脊椎按摩师和/或物理治疗师(PT)的慢性背痛或颈痛患者的代表性样本(n = 684)进行了计算机辅助电话调查。询问患者是否被开具了运动处方、接受的监督量以及所开运动处方的类型、时长和频率。进行了描述性和多变量回归分析。
在684名受试者中,48%的人被开具了运动处方。在那些被开具运动处方的人中,46%的处方来自物理治疗师,29%来自医生,21%来自脊椎按摩师,4%来自其他。在多变量分析中,看物理治疗师或脊椎按摩师是运动处方最强的预测因素。女性、受教育程度较高者以及领取工伤赔偿者开具运动处方的可能性增加。与医生和脊椎按摩师相比,物理治疗师更有可能提供监督并开具强化运动处方,与医生相比,物理治疗师更有可能开具伸展运动处方。
我们的研究结果表明,运动作为慢性背痛和颈痛的一种治疗方法未得到充分利用,并且在一定程度上,所提供的监督量和所开运动处方的类型未遵循当前的实践指南。物理治疗师提供的运动处方似乎最符合当前指南。