Adhikari Shiva R, Maskay Nephil M, Sharma Bishnu P
Nepal Health Economics Association, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Mar;24(2):129-39. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn052. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
Households obtaining health care services in developing countries incur substantial costs, despite services generally being provided free of charge by public health institutions. This constitutes an economic burden on low-income households, and contributes to deepening their level of poverty. In addition to the economic burden of obtaining health care, the method of financing these payments has implications for the distribution of household assets. This effect on resource-poor households is amplified since they have decreased access to health insurance. Recent literature, however, ignores the importance of the method of financing health care payments. This paper looks at the case of Nepal and highlights the impact on households of paying for hospital-based care of Kala-azar (KA) by analysing the catastrophic, impoverishment and economic consequences of their coping strategies. The paper utilizes micro-data on a random selection of 50% of the KA-affected households of Siraha and Saptari districts of Nepal. The empirical results suggest that direct costs of hospital-based treatment of KA are catastrophic since they consume 17% of annual household income. This expenditure causes more than 20% of KA-affected households to fall below the poverty line, with the remaining households being pushed into the category of marginal poor; the poverty gap ratio is more than 90%. Further, KA incidence can have prolonged and severe economic consequences for the household economy due to the mechanisms of informal sector financing to which households resort. A heavy burden of loan repayments can lead households on a downward spiral that eventually becomes a poverty trap. In other words, the method of financing health care payments is an important ingredient in understanding the economic burden of disease.
在发展中国家,尽管公共卫生机构通常免费提供医疗服务,但家庭获取医疗保健服务仍需承担巨额费用。这给低收入家庭带来了经济负担,加剧了他们的贫困程度。除了获取医疗保健的经济负担外,支付这些费用的融资方式还会对家庭资产分配产生影响。由于资源匮乏家庭获得医疗保险的机会减少,这种影响对他们来说更为严重。然而,近期的文献忽略了医疗保健支付融资方式的重要性。本文以尼泊尔为例,通过分析家庭应对策略的灾难性、贫困化和经济后果,突出了支付黑热病(KA)住院治疗费用对家庭的影响。本文利用了尼泊尔锡拉哈和萨普塔里地区受KA影响家庭中随机抽取的50%的微观数据。实证结果表明,KA住院治疗的直接成本具有灾难性,因为它们消耗了家庭年收入的17%。这笔支出导致超过20%的受KA影响家庭陷入贫困线以下,其余家庭则沦为边缘贫困人口;贫困差距率超过90%。此外,由于家庭采用的非正规部门融资机制,KA发病可能会对家庭经济产生长期而严重的经济后果。沉重的贷款偿还负担可能导致家庭陷入恶性循环,最终成为贫困陷阱。换句话说,医疗保健支付的融资方式是理解疾病经济负担的一个重要因素。