Suppr超能文献

Risk profile of walk-in triage compared with an appointment-based phone-triage evening clinic.

作者信息

Jongeling S, Chen M Y, Bush M R, Bradshaw C S, Fairley C K

机构信息

Faculty of Earth and Life Science, VU University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Feb;20(2):135-7. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008247.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare risk factors in new clients attending the walk-in triage-based day clinic (WITS) to those attending a telephone-triage appointment-based evening clinic of a sexual health service. The method involves an audit of computerized medical records of new clients attending between July 2002 and December 2007. There were 37,833 new clients of which 37,223 (98.4%) attended WITS and 610 (1.6%) attended the evening clinic. WITS clients were significantly older (31% vs. 30%, P < 0.041), more likely to be male (58% vs. 43%, P < 0.001), sex workers (6% vs. 3%, P < 0.001), not employed (34% vs. 10%, P < 0.001), diagnosed with gonorrhoea (1.7% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.041), herpes (4% vs. 2%, P < 0.000), non-specific urethritis (6% vs. 2%, P < 0.000) and less likely asymptomatic (35.1% vs. 53.4%, P < 0.001). Men attending WITS had significantly more female partners in the 12 months (3.9 vs. 3.0, P < 0.001), but other risks were similar in both clinics. A telephone-triage appointment-based evening clinic is important for asymptomatic high-risk individuals.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验