von Hertzen H, Piaggio G, Wojdyla D, Marions L, My Huong N T, Tang O S, Fang A H, Wu S C, Kalmar L, Mittal S, Erdenetungalag R, Horga M, Pretnar-Darovec A, Kapamadzija A, Dickson K, Anh N D, Tai N V, Tuyet H T D, Peregoudov A
UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
BJOG. 2009 Feb;116(3):381-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02034.x.
To compare the efficacy of 100 mg and 200 mg of mifepristone and 24- and 48-hour intervals to administration of 800 microg vaginal misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy.
Placebo-controlled, randomized, equivalence trial, stratified by centre.
13 departments of obstetrics and gynecology in nine countries.
2,181 women with 63 days or less gestation requesting medical abortion.
Two-sided 95% CI for the risk differences of failure to complete abortion were calculated and compared with 5% equivalence margin between two doses of mifepristone and two intervals to misoprostol administration. Proportions of women with adverse effects were compared between the regimens using standard testes for proportions.
Rates of complete abortion without surgical intervention and adverse effects associated with the regimens.
Efficacy outcome was analysed for 2,126 women (97.5%) excluding 55 lost to follow up. Both mifepristone doses were found to be similar in efficacy. The rate of complete abortion was 92.0% for women assigned 100 mg of mifepristone and 93.2% for women assigned 200 mg of mifepristone (difference 1.2%, 95% CI: -1.0 to 3.5). Equivalence was also evident for the two intervals of administration: the rate of complete abortion was 93.5% for 24-hour interval and 91.7% for the 48-hour interval (difference -1.8%, 95% CI: -4.0 to 0.5). Interaction between doses and interval to misoprostol administration was not significant (P = 0.92). Adverse effects related to treatments did not differ between the groups.
Both the 100 and 200 mg doses of mifepristone and the 24- and 48-hour intervals have a similar efficacy to achieve complete abortion in early pregnancy when mifepristone is followed by 800 micrograms of vaginally administered misoprostol.
比较100毫克和200毫克米非司酮以及在服用800微克阴道用米索前列醇前24小时和48小时间隔用于终止早期妊娠的疗效。
安慰剂对照、随机、等效性试验,按中心分层。
9个国家的13个妇产科科室。
2181名妊娠63天或以内要求药物流产的妇女。
计算未完成流产风险差异的双侧95%置信区间,并与两种米非司酮剂量和两种米索前列醇给药间隔之间5%的等效性界限进行比较。使用比例的标准检验比较各治疗方案中出现不良反应的妇女比例。
无手术干预的完全流产率以及与各治疗方案相关的不良反应。
对2126名妇女(97.5%)进行了疗效分析,排除了55名失访者。发现两种米非司酮剂量的疗效相似。服用100毫克米非司酮的妇女完全流产率为92.0%,服用200毫克米非司酮的妇女完全流产率为93.2%(差异1.2%,95%置信区间:-1.0至3.5)。两种给药间隔的等效性也很明显:24小时间隔的完全流产率为93.5%,48小时间隔的完全流产率为91.7%(差异-1.8%,95%置信区间:-4.0至0.5)。米非司酮剂量与米索前列醇给药间隔之间的交互作用不显著(P = 0.92)。各治疗组之间与治疗相关的不良反应无差异。
当米非司酮后接800微克阴道给药的米索前列醇时,100毫克和200毫克剂量的米非司酮以及24小时和48小时间隔在实现早期妊娠完全流产方面具有相似的疗效。