Suppr超能文献

氟桂利嗪是一种长效口服非典型抗精神病药物吗?一项与氟哌啶醇对比治疗精神分裂症的随机临床试验。

Is flunarizine a long-acting oral atypical antipsychotic? A randomized clinical trial versus haloperidol for the treatment of schizophrenia.

作者信息

Bisol Luísa W, Brunstein Miriam G, Ottoni Gustavo L, Ramos Fernanda L P, Borba Daniela L, Daltio Claudiane S, de Oliveira Ricardo V, Paz Gisele E G, de Souza Sayuri E, Bressan Rodrigo A, Lara Diogo R

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Universidad Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 90619-900.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;69(10):1572-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n1007. Epub 2008 Sep 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Flunarizine is known as a nonspecific calcium channel blocker that has been used for decades for the treatment of migraine, vertigo, and cognitive deficits related to cerebrovascular disorders. Flunarizine also has dopamine D2 receptor blocking properties and was effective in animal models of predictive validity for antipsychotics. However, its clinical antipsychotic efficacy has never been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of flunarizine compared to haloperidol in outpatients with stable and chronic DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

METHOD

Seventy patients from 2 centers were randomly assigned and participated in a double-blind, parallel-group, flexible-dose study comparing flunarizine (10-50 mg/day) and haloperidol (2.5-12.5 mg/day) for 12 weeks. Patients were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), a battery for cognitive performance, and laboratory examinations. The study was conducted from September 2004 to May 2007.

RESULTS

Mean doses at endpoint were 29.7 mg/day for flunarizine and 6.4 mg/day for haloperidol. Both groups showed significant symptom improvement during the study, with a reduction of 21% in the flunarizine group and 19% in the haloperidol group in PANSS total scores (p < .05). There were no significant differences in PANSS overall score and all subscales, CGI-I score, or cognitive performance. Dropout rates, ESRS scores, and prolactin levels were not different between groups, but significantly more patients reported emergence of akathisia in the haloperidol group (p = .04), and weight gain was significantly higher with flunarizine (1.2 kg) than with haloperidol (-0.8 kg) (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study evaluating the antipsychotic properties of flunarizine, which showed good efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of schizophrenia, with a possible atypical profile. Its unique pharmacokinetic profile as an oral drug with long half-life (2-7 weeks), low cost, and low induction of extrapyramidal symptoms warrants further investigation, particularly in psychiatric patients with low adherence to treatment.

摘要

背景

氟桂利嗪是一种非特异性钙通道阻滞剂,数十年来一直用于治疗偏头痛、眩晕以及与脑血管疾病相关的认知缺陷。氟桂利嗪还具有多巴胺D2受体阻断特性,在抗精神病药物预测效度的动物模型中有效。然而,其临床抗精神病疗效从未得到研究。

目的

评估氟桂利嗪与氟哌啶醇相比,对符合DSM-IV标准的稳定慢性精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍门诊患者的治疗效果和耐受性。

方法

来自2个中心的70名患者被随机分配,参与一项双盲、平行组、灵活剂量研究,比较氟桂利嗪(10 - 50毫克/天)和氟哌啶醇(2.5 - 12.5毫克/天),为期12周。使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)、锥体外系症状评定量表(ESRS)、一套认知功能测试以及实验室检查对患者进行评估。该研究于2004年9月至2007年5月进行。

结果

研究终点时氟桂利嗪的平均剂量为29.7毫克/天,氟哌啶醇为6.4毫克/天。两组在研究期间均显示出症状显著改善,PANSS总分在氟桂利嗪组降低了21%,氟哌啶醇组降低了19%(p < 0.05)。PANSS总分及所有子量表、CGI-I评分或认知功能方面均无显著差异。两组的脱落率、ESRS评分和催乳素水平无差异,但氟哌啶醇组报告出现静坐不能的患者显著更多(p = 0.04),且氟桂利嗪组的体重增加(1.2千克)显著高于氟哌啶醇组(-0.8千克)(p < 0.05)。

结论

这是第一项评估氟桂利嗪抗精神病特性的研究,结果显示其对精神分裂症治疗具有良好疗效和耐受性,可能具有非典型特征。其作为口服药物具有独特的药代动力学特征,半衰期长(两周至七周)、成本低且锥体外系症状诱发率低,值得进一步研究,特别是在治疗依从性低的精神科患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验