Suppr超能文献

重罪审前毒品法庭中应急管理的有效性试验。

An effectiveness trial of contingency management in a felony preadjudication drug court.

作者信息

Marlowe Douglas B, Festinger David S, Dugosh Karen L, Arabia Patricia L, Kirby Kimberly C

机构信息

Treatment Research Institute, 600 Public Ledger Building, 150 S. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):565-77. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-565.

Abstract

This study evaluated a contingency management (CM) program in a drug court. Gift certificates for compliance were delivered at 4- to 6-week intervals (total value = $390.00). Participants in one condition earned gift certificates that escalated by $5.00 increments. Participants in a second condition began earning higher magnitude gift certificates, and the density of reinforcement was gradually decreased. No main effects of CM were detected, which appears to be attributable to a ceiling effect from the intensive contingencies already delivered in the drug court and the low density of reinforcement. Preplanned interaction analyses suggested that participants with more serious criminal backgrounds might have performed better in the CM conditions. This suggests that CM programs may be best suited for more incorrigible drug offenders.

摘要

本研究评估了药物法庭中的一种权变管理(CM)项目。合规礼品券每隔4至6周发放一次(总价值为390.00美元)。一种条件下的参与者获得的礼品券每次递增5.00美元。另一种条件下的参与者开始获得面额更高的礼品券,强化频率逐渐降低。未检测到CM的主效应,这似乎归因于药物法庭已实施的强化措施所产生的天花板效应以及较低的强化频率。预先计划的交互分析表明,有更严重犯罪背景的参与者在CM条件下可能表现更好。这表明CM项目可能最适合那些更难以矫正的吸毒罪犯。

相似文献

1
An effectiveness trial of contingency management in a felony preadjudication drug court.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):565-77. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-565.
2
A multi-site study of the use of sanctions and incentives in mental health courts.
Law Hum Behav. 2013 Feb;37(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/h0093989. Epub 2012 May 7.
3
Crime and punishment and treatment: latest findings in the treatment of drug-related offenders.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2003 Oct;25(3):187-8. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(03)00124-7.
4
Los Angeles County drug court programs: initial results.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Oct;23(3):217-24. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00262-3.
5
Efficacy of a Mental Health Treatment Court with assertive community treatment.
Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):199-214. doi: 10.1002/bsl.638.
6
Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court.
Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):183-98. doi: 10.1002/bsl.636.
8
Drug courts: current issues and future perspectives.
Subst Use Misuse. 2003 Sep-Nov;38(11-13):1671-711. doi: 10.1081/ja-120024237.
10
Juvenile drug courts: emerging outcomes and key research issues.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 May;20(3):242-6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3280ebb601.

引用本文的文献

1
Contingency Management for Drug Use Disorders: Meta-Analysis and Application of Tolin's Criteria.
Clin Psychol (New York). 2024 Jun;31(2):136-150. doi: 10.1037/cps0000121. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Assessing the reliability and validity of the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) program tool.
Health Justice. 2022 Jun 9;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40352-022-00182-w.
4
The Legitimacy of Change: Adopting/Adapting, Implementing and Sustaining Reforms within Community Corrections Agencies.
Br J Criminol. 2021 Apr 5;61(6):1665-1683. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azab020. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Contingency management for treatment attendance: A meta-analysis.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Feb;133:108556. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108556. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
6
Juvenile probation officers' perceptions on youth substance use varies from task-shifting to family-based contingency management.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Jan;120:108144. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108144. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
7
Assessing the Use and Impact of Points and Rewards across Four Federal Probation Districts: A Contingency Management Approach.
Vict Offender. 2019;14(7):811-831. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2019.1656691. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
8
Interventions for female drug-using offenders.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 13;12(12):CD010910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010910.pub3.
9
Interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental health problems.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 7;10(10):CD010901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010901.pub3.
10
Effectiveness of Using Incentives to Improve Parolee Admission and Attendance in Community Addiction Treatment.
Crim Justice Behav. 2015 Oct;42(10):1008-1031. doi: 10.1177/0093854815592914. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized trial of employment-based reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in injection drug users.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;40(3):387-410. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-387.
2
Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis.
Addiction. 2006 Nov;101(11):1546-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01581.x.
3
Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: implications for dissemination.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Oct 15;85(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 2.
4
A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders.
Addiction. 2006 Feb;101(2):192-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01311.x.
6
Discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers: relationship to antisocial personality disorder.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Aug;162(4):425-32. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1115-1. Epub 2002 Jun 7.
7
Contingency management in outpatient methadone treatment: a meta-analysis.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000 Feb 1;58(1-2):55-66. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00068-x.
8
Broad beneficial effects of cocaine abstinence reinforcement among methadone patients.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Oct;66(5):811-24. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.66.5.811.
9
Schedule of voucher delivery influences initiation of cocaine abstinence.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Oct;66(5):761-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.66.5.761.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验