Suppr超能文献

对剑桥-霍普金斯问卷(CH-RLSq)进行验证,以在人群调查中确定不宁腿综合征(RLS)。

Validation of the self-completed Cambridge-Hopkins questionnaire (CH-RLSq) for ascertainment of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in a population survey.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Sleep Med. 2009 Dec;10(10):1097-100. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.10.007. Epub 2009 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Epidemiological studies of restless legs syndrome (RLS) have been limited by lack of a well validated patient-completed diagnostic questionnaire that has a high enough specificity to provide a reasonable positive predictive value. Most of the currently used patient completed diagnostic questionnaires have neither been validated nor included items facilitating the differential diagnosis of RLS from conditions producing similar symptoms. The Cambridge-Hopkins diagnostic questionnaire for RLS (CH-RLSq) was developed with several iterations to include items covering the basic diagnostic features of RLS and to provide some basic differential diagnosis. This validation study sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the RLS diagnosis based on this questionnaire.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The CH-RLSq was completed by 2005 blood donors who were asked to consent to being contacted for a telephone diagnostic interview. A scoring criterion was established for ascertainment of RLS based on the clinical definition of the disorder and the exclusion of "mimic" conditions. A weighted sample (N=185) of all completed questionnaires was selected for expert clinical diagnosis of RLS using the validated Hopkins Telephone Diagnostic Interview (HDTI). The telephone interviewers were blinded to all questionnaire responses.

RESULTS

A telephone diagnosis was obtained on 183 of the sample's 185 questionnaires. The questionnaire's normalized sensitivity and specificity were 87.2% and 94.4%, respectively, for RLS compared to not RLS. The positive predictive values in this sample were 85.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cambridge-Hopkins RLS questionnaire provides a reasonable level of sensitivity and specificity for ascertainment of RLS in population-based studies.

摘要

背景与目的

由于缺乏经过充分验证的、能够提供合理阳性预测值的患者自填式诊断问卷,对不安腿综合征(RLS)的流行病学研究受到限制。目前使用的大多数患者自填式诊断问卷既未经验证,也未纳入有助于RLS与产生类似症状的疾病进行鉴别诊断的项目。剑桥-霍普金斯 RLS 诊断问卷(CH-RLSq)经过多次迭代开发,纳入了涵盖 RLS 基本诊断特征的项目,并提供了一些基本的鉴别诊断。这项验证研究旨在确定该问卷基于 RLS 诊断的灵敏度和特异性。

患者与方法

2005 年的献血者填写了 CH-RLSq,并同意接受电话诊断访谈。根据该疾病的临床定义和排除“模仿”病症,建立了一个用于确定 RLS 的评分标准。使用经过验证的霍普金斯电话诊断访谈(HDTI)对所有完成的问卷进行加权抽样(N=185),对专家临床诊断 RLS 进行评估。电话访谈员对所有问卷回答均不知情。

结果

185 份样本中的 183 份获得了电话诊断。与非 RLS 相比,该问卷的标准化灵敏度和特异性分别为 87.2%和 94.4%。该样本的阳性预测值为 85.5%。

结论

剑桥-霍普金斯 RLS 问卷在基于人群的研究中,对 RLS 的确定具有合理的灵敏度和特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验