Suppr超能文献

改善心理治疗的可及性:第四阶段前瞻性队列研究。

Improving access to psychological therapies: phase IV prospective cohort study.

机构信息

University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Psychol. 2009 Nov;48(Pt 4):377-96. doi: 10.1348/014466509X405178. Epub 2009 Feb 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of implementing stepped care evidence-based psychological treatments for anxiety and depression in routine practice using a collaborative care implementation model.

DESIGN

Observational prospective cohort study/Phase IV field trial.

METHODS

We collected data on depression and anxiety from a prospective cohort of 3,994 consecutive patients referred to the UK Improving Access to Psychological Therapies demonstration site in Doncaster for 12 months from August 2006 using PHQ-9 and GAD-7. We collected demographic and process information including the type and methods of treatments received. We calculated effect sizes, remission, and recovery rates for patients competing treatment and those who dropped out or were considered to be unsuitable.

RESULTS

Two thousand seven hundred and ninety-five patients received an assessment, out of which 2,017 received two or more appointments. Out of these, 869 had completed treatment by the census date, 743 remained in treatment, 319 had dropped out, and 85 had been found to be unsuitable. Pre-post treatment effect sizes for anxiety and depression in those patients completing treatment were 1.39 and 1.41, respectively, with post-treatment relative risks of depression and anxiety 0.29 and 0.34. The combined remission and recovery rates were 76% for depression and 74% for anxiety. The mean number of treatment sessions was 5.15 in a mean time of 2 h and 45 min. On an average, patients received at least three of these contacts by telephone. Outcomes are comparable with benchmarked trials, reviews, and routine datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining low-intensity stepped care psychological treatment with a telephony-based collaborative care organizational system can deliver good clinical outcomes in routine practice.

摘要

目的

使用协作式护理实施模式,确定在常规实践中实施基于循证的焦虑和抑郁阶梯式护理治疗的效果。

设计

观察性前瞻性队列研究/第四阶段现场试验。

方法

我们从 2006 年 8 月起,在英国改善心理治疗可及性示范基地唐卡斯特,对 3994 例连续转诊的患者进行了为期 12 个月的前瞻性队列研究,使用 PHQ-9 和 GAD-7 评估抑郁和焦虑。我们收集了人口统计学和过程信息,包括所接受的治疗类型和方法。我们计算了竞争治疗的患者以及退出或被认为不适合的患者的治疗效果大小、缓解率和恢复率。

结果

2795 例患者接受了评估,其中 2017 例接受了两次或更多次预约。在这些患者中,869 例在普查日期前完成了治疗,743 例仍在治疗中,319 例退出治疗,85 例被认为不适合治疗。完成治疗的患者焦虑和抑郁的治疗前后效应大小分别为 1.39 和 1.41,抑郁和焦虑的治疗后相对风险分别为 0.29 和 0.34。抑郁和焦虑的缓解和恢复综合率分别为 76%和 74%。平均治疗次数为 5.15 次,平均时间为 2 小时 45 分钟。平均而言,患者通过电话至少接受了其中 3 次治疗。结果与基准试验、综述和常规数据集相当。

结论

将低强度阶梯式心理治疗与基于电话的协作式护理组织系统相结合,可以在常规实践中提供良好的临床效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验