The fallacy of impartiality: competing interest bias in academic publications.
作者信息
Smith Richard, Feachem Richard, Feachem Neelam Sekhri, Koehlmoos Tracey Perez, Kinlaw Heather
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 2009 Feb;102(2):44-5. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.080400.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The fallacy of impartiality: competing interest bias in academic publications.
J R Soc Med. 2009 Feb;102(2):44-5. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.080400.
2
The fallacy of competing interest statements: no shortcut to rigour in research.
J R Soc Med. 2009 Apr;102(4):126. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.09k016.
3
Competing interest bias in academic publications.
J R Soc Med. 2009 Feb;102(2):49. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.09k005.
4
Competing interests.
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Oct;21(10):1131. doi: 10.1038/nbt1003-1131a.
5
[Conflict of interest declarations in scientific publications].
Nervenarzt. 2008 Sep;79(9):1001-5. doi: 10.1007/s00115-008-2543-x.
6
Disclosure of competing interests.
BMJ. 2009 Oct 12;339:b4144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4144.
7
[Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICJME journals].
Nutr Hosp. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):627-8.
8
Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1896-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0909052. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
9
Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals.
JAMA. 2010 Jan 6;303(1):75-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1542. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
10
Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals.
Lancet. 2009 Oct 24;374(9699):1395-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61796-7. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
引用本文的文献
1
Users' perception of quality as a driver of private healthcare use in Mexico: Insights from the People's Voice Survey.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0306179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306179. eCollection 2024.
2
Perspective: Standards for Research and Reporting on Low-Energy ("Artificial") Sweeteners.
Adv Nutr. 2020 May 1;11(3):484-491. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz137.
3
What Makes International Global Health University Partnerships Higher-Value? An Examination of Partnership Types and Activities Favoured at Four East African Universities.
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Apr 30;84(1):139-150. doi: 10.29024/aogh.20.
4
A critique of the "ultra-high risk" and "transition" paradigm.
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):200-206. doi: 10.1002/wps.20423.
5
Comparative performance of private and public healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001244. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
6
Declare all or be damned OR Bias in the eye of the beholder.
J R Soc Med. 2009 Jul;102(7):259. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090104.
7
How to deal with competing interests.
J R Soc Med. 2009 Jul;102(7):259. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090126.
8
The fallacy of competing interest statements: no shortcut to rigour in research.
J R Soc Med. 2009 Apr;102(4):126. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.09k016.
9
Competing interest bias in academic publications.
J R Soc Med. 2009 Feb;102(2):49. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.09k005.
本文引用的文献
1
Is private health care the answer to the health problems of the world's poor?
PLoS Med. 2008 Nov 25;5(11):e233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050233.
2
Making sense of non-financial competing interests.
PLoS Med. 2008 Sep 30;5(9):e199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050199.
3
Everyone's a little bit biased (even physicians).
JAMA. 2008 Jun 25;299(24):2893-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.24.2893.
4
The writing is on the wall for UNAIDS.
BMJ. 2008 May 10;336(7652):1072. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39569.497708.94.
5
Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers' perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trial.
BMJ. 2004 Mar 27;328(7442):742-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38035.705185.F6. Epub 2004 Feb 23.
6
Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial.
BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1391-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1391.
7
The concept of stewardship in health policy.
Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):732-9.
Zotero 插件