Lerman Israel, Díaz Juan Pablo Moreira, Ibarguengoitia Ma Elena Romero, Pérez Francisco Javier Gómez, Villa Antonio R, Velasco Maria Luisa, Cruz Roberto Gómez, Rodrigo Juan Antonio Rull
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Endocr Pract. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):41-6. doi: 10.4158/EP.15.1.41.
To evaluate the psychosocial barriers to insulin use in low-income, type 2 diabetic patients; the clinical characteristics of these patients; and the possible causes of nonadherence to insulin regimens months after prescription.
We studied a prospective cohort of low-income patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, aged 45 to 75 years, attending a tertiary health care center in Mexico City, Mexico. Patients were eligible if their diabetes was not controlled with oral agents, and they were excluded if they had type 1 diabetes mellitus, a secondary cause of diabetes, had been admitted to the hospital within the month before study commencement, had been previously treated with insulin, had severe diabetic complications, or had a chronic or disabling medical illness. All patients were prescribed 6 to 10 units of neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin before bedtime and received a referral to visit with a diabetes nurse educator. The main outcome was adherence or nonadherence to insulin therapy, and it was correlated with several variables including attitudes toward insulin, diabetes self-management, diabetes-related knowledge, depression, and diabetes-related distress. Brief medical history, complete battery of questionnaires, and laboratory workup were obtained at baseline and 1 to 3 months after insulin prescription.
Twenty-nine consecutive patients were included. Mean age (+/- standard deviation) was 59 +/- 8 years, 18 (62%) were women, mean diabetes duration was 14 +/- 9 years, and mean hemoglobin A1c level was 10.8 +/- 1.4%. Negative attitudes toward insulin were very common, particularly in patients with less education and poorer diabetes-related knowledge (odds ratio, 6.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-47.3; P = .02). Even when they received precise recommendations, 12 patients (41%) did not adhere to insulin treatment. Patients who did not adhere to therapy were most commonly women and were depressed (P = .05). Improved adherence was significantly associated with the additional support of a diabetes nurse educator (odds ratio, 6.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-55.7; P = .02).
Improving patient perception and acceptance of insulin with the help of diabetes educators can facilitate earlier and more aggressive intervention and thus optimize glycemic control.
评估低收入2型糖尿病患者使用胰岛素的社会心理障碍;这些患者的临床特征;以及处方后数月不坚持胰岛素治疗方案的可能原因。
我们对墨西哥城一家三级医疗保健中心的45至75岁低收入2型糖尿病患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。如果患者的糖尿病无法通过口服药物控制,则符合入选条件;如果患有1型糖尿病、继发性糖尿病、在研究开始前一个月内入院、曾接受胰岛素治疗、有严重糖尿病并发症或患有慢性或致残性疾病,则被排除。所有患者睡前均被处方6至10单位的中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素,并被转介去拜访糖尿病护士教育者。主要结局是坚持或不坚持胰岛素治疗,并将其与包括对胰岛素的态度、糖尿病自我管理、糖尿病相关知识、抑郁和糖尿病相关困扰等多个变量相关联。在基线以及胰岛素处方后1至3个月时获取简要病史、全套问卷和实验室检查结果。
纳入了连续的29例患者。平均年龄(±标准差)为59±8岁,18例(62%)为女性,平均糖尿病病程为14±9年,平均糖化血红蛋白水平为10.8±1.4%。对胰岛素的负面态度非常普遍,尤其是在教育程度较低且糖尿病相关知识较差的患者中(优势比,6.2;95%置信区间,1.04 - 47.3;P = 0.02)。即使他们得到了精确的建议,12例患者(41%)仍未坚持胰岛素治疗。不坚持治疗的患者最常见的是女性且患有抑郁症(P = 0.05)。坚持情况的改善与糖尿病护士教育者的额外支持显著相关(优势比,6.6;95%置信区间,1.0 - 55.7;P = 0.02)。
在糖尿病教育者的帮助下提高患者对胰岛素的认知和接受度,可以促进更早、更积极的干预,从而优化血糖控制。