Andreescu Carmen, Lenze Eric J, Mulsant Benoit H, Wetherell Julie Loebach, Begley Amy E, Mazumdar Sati, Reynolds Charles F
The Advanced Center in Interventions and Services Research for Late-Life Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(3):266-72. doi: 10.1002/da.20544.
Co-morbid anxiety symptoms are common in late-life depression (LLD) and predict poorer treatment outcomes. No research has delineated the impact of different dimensions of anxiety (such as worry/anxious apprehension and panic/anxious arousal) on treatment response in LLD. We explored the impact of the dimensions of worry and panic on acute and maintenance treatment outcomes in LLD.
We measured anxiety symptoms in 170 LLD subjects receiving protocolized treatment. Exploratory principal component analysis was used to delineate dimensions of anxiety symptoms. We defined sub-groups based on factor scores. We used survival analysis to test the association of pretreatment anxiety dimensions with time to response and time to recurrence of LLD.
The principal component analysis found two factors: "worry" and "panic." Three sub-groups were defined: low panic-low worry, low panic-high worry, and high panic-high worry. The low panic-high worry and high panic-high worry sub-groups had longer time to response than the low panic-low worry sub-group. Time to recurrence was longer in low panic-low worry subjects randomized to drug. Among subjects with high worry, there was no difference between those with low versus high panic regarding both time to response and time to recurrence of LLD.
High levels of worry were associated with longer time to response and earlier recurrence with pharmacotherapy for LLD. There was no additional effect of panic symptoms on treatment outcomes when accounting for the effects of excessive worry. These results suggest that worry symptoms should be a focus of strategies to improve acute and maintenance treatment response in LLD.
共病焦虑症状在老年期抑郁症(LLD)中很常见,且预示着较差的治疗结果。尚无研究阐明焦虑的不同维度(如担忧/焦虑性 apprehensions 和惊恐/焦虑性唤起)对 LLD 治疗反应的影响。我们探讨了担忧和惊恐维度对 LLD 急性和维持治疗结果的影响。
我们测量了 170 名接受标准化治疗的 LLD 患者的焦虑症状。采用探索性主成分分析来阐明焦虑症状的维度。我们根据因子得分定义亚组。我们使用生存分析来测试治疗前焦虑维度与 LLD 缓解时间和复发时间的关联。
主成分分析发现两个因子:“担忧”和“惊恐”。定义了三个亚组:低惊恐-低担忧、低惊恐-高担忧和高惊恐-高担忧。低惊恐-高担忧和高惊恐-高担忧亚组的缓解时间比低惊恐-低担忧亚组更长。随机接受药物治疗的低惊恐-低担忧患者的复发时间更长。在高担忧的患者中,低惊恐和高惊恐患者在 LLD 的缓解时间和复发时间方面没有差异。
高程度的担忧与 LLD 药物治疗的缓解时间延长和复发较早相关。在考虑过度担忧的影响时,惊恐症状对治疗结果没有额外影响。这些结果表明,担忧症状应成为改善 LLD 急性和维持治疗反应策略的重点。