Divin M F, Bradbury F A, Carroll F I, Traynor J R
Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, 1150 W. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5632, USA.
Br J Pharmacol. 2009 Apr;156(7):1044-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00035.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
Adenylyl cyclase sensitization occurs on chronic agonist activation of mu-opioid receptors and is manifested by an increase in cAMP levels (overshoot) on challenge with antagonist. It has been proposed that a long lasting constitutively active receptor is formed on chronic mu-opioid exposure and that antagonists with inverse agonist activity rapidly return the receptor to a basal state causing a cAMP overshoot and a more severe withdrawal response in vivo. This hypothesis depends on an accurate characterization of neutral and inverse agonist properties of opioid antagonists.
C6 glioma and HEK293 cells expressing mu-opioid receptors were used. Opioid antagonists were examined for their ability to induce a cAMP overshoot following chronic treatment with the agonist DAMGO ([D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Glyol(5)]-enkephalin). The compounds were also characterized as agonists, inverse agonists or neutral antagonists by using assays for competitive binding, [(35)S]GTPgammaS (guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate) binding and changes in cell surface receptor expression.
Naltrexone, 6beta-naltrexol and naloxone were indistinguishable to the mu-opioid receptor in the opioid-naïve or dependent state and acted as neutral antagonists. The delta-opioid receptor inverse agonist RTI-5989-25 [(+)-N-[trans-4'-(2-methylphenyl)-2'-butenyl]-(3R,4R)-dimethyl-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine], a 3,4-dimethyl-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-piperidine, was an inverse agonist at the mu-opioid receptor, and the peptide antagonist CTAP (H-D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2)) showed variable, assay-dependent properties. All the antagonists precipitated the same degree of cAMP overshoot in opioid-dependent cells.
Antagonists at the mu-opioid receptor may be neutral or show inverse agonist activity. Formation of a constitutively active mu-opioid receptor is not a requirement for the development or expression of adenylyl cyclase sensitization.
腺苷酸环化酶致敏现象发生于μ-阿片受体的慢性激动剂激活过程中,表现为在给予拮抗剂激发时环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)水平升高(超调)。有人提出,在长期暴露于μ-阿片类物质的情况下会形成一种持久的组成型活性受体,而具有反向激动剂活性的拮抗剂会迅速使该受体恢复到基础状态,从而导致cAMP超调,并在体内引发更严重的戒断反应。这一假说依赖于对阿片类拮抗剂的中性和反向激动剂特性的准确表征。
使用表达μ-阿片受体的C6胶质瘤细胞和人胚肾293(HEK293)细胞。在用激动剂DAMGO([D-丙氨酸(2),N-甲基苯丙氨酸(4),甘醇(5)]-脑啡肽)进行慢性处理后,检测阿片类拮抗剂诱导cAMP超调的能力。还通过竞争性结合测定、[³⁵S]GTPγS(鸟苷-5'-O-(3-[(³⁵S]硫代)三磷酸)结合测定以及细胞表面受体表达变化,将这些化合物表征为激动剂、反向激动剂或中性拮抗剂。
纳曲酮、6β-纳曲醇和纳洛酮在未接触阿片类物质或处于阿片类物质依赖状态时,对μ-阿片受体的作用无法区分,且表现为中性拮抗剂。δ-阿片受体反向激动剂RTI-5989-25 [(+)-N-[反式-4'-(2-甲基苯基)-2'-丁烯基] -(3R,4R)-二甲基-4-(3-羟基苯基)哌啶],一种3,4-二甲基-4-(3-羟基苯基)-哌啶,是μ-阿片受体的反向激动剂,而肽拮抗剂CTAP(H-D-苯丙氨酸-半胱氨酸-酪氨酸-D-色氨酸-精氨酸-苏氨酸-青霉胺-苏氨酸-NH₂)表现出依赖于检测方法的可变特性。所有拮抗剂在阿片类物质依赖的细胞中引发相同程度的cAMP超调。
μ-阿片受体拮抗剂可能是中性的,也可能表现出反向激动剂活性。组成型活性μ-阿片受体的形成并非腺苷酸环化酶致敏发生或表达的必要条件。