Baker Jason M
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Indiana University, Goodbody Hall 130, 1011 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2005 Jun;36(2):303-26. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.005.
Recent discussion of mechanism has suggested new approaches to several issues in the philosophy of science, including theory structure, causal explanation, and reductionism. Here, I apply what I take to be the fruits of the 'new mechanical philosophy' to an analysis of a contemporary debate in evolutionary biology about the role of natural selection in speciation. Traditional accounts of that debate focus on the geographic context of genetic divergence--namely, whether divergence in the absence of geographic isolation is possible (or significant). Those accounts are at best incomplete, I argue, because they ignore the mechanisms producing divergence and miss what is at stake in the biological debate. I argue that the biological debate instead concerns the scope of particular speciation mechanisms which assign different roles to natural selection at various stages of divergence. The upshot is a new interpretation of the crux of that debate-namely, whether divergence with gene flow is possible (or significant) and whether the isolating mechanisms producing it are adaptive.
最近关于机制的讨论为科学哲学中的几个问题提出了新方法,包括理论结构、因果解释和还原论。在此,我将我所认为的“新机械哲学”的成果应用于对进化生物学中一场当代辩论的分析,这场辩论涉及自然选择在物种形成中的作用。关于那场辩论的传统论述聚焦于基因分化的地理背景——即,在没有地理隔离的情况下分化是否可能(或显著)。我认为,那些论述至多是不完整的,因为它们忽略了产生分化的机制,并且没有抓住生物学辩论的关键所在。我认为,生物学辩论实际上关注的是特定物种形成机制的范围,这些机制在分化的各个阶段赋予自然选择不同的角色。结果是对那场辩论的关键问题有了一种新解释——即,有基因流情况下的分化是否可能(或显著),以及产生这种分化的隔离机制是否具有适应性。