Skipper Robert A, Millstein Roberta L
Department of Philosophy, ML 0374, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0374, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2005 Jun;36(2):327-47. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.006.
This paper explores whether natural selection, a putative evolutionary mechanism, and a main one at that, can be characterized on either of the two dominant conceptions of mechanism, due to Glennan and the team of Machamer, Darden, and Craver, that constitute the new mechanistic philosophy'. The results of the analysis are that neither of the dominant conceptions of mechanism adequately captures natural selection. Nevertheless, the new mechanistic philosophy possesses the resources for an understanding of natural selection under the rubric.
本文探讨了自然选择这一假定的进化机制(且是主要的进化机制),能否依据构成“新机械论哲学”的两种主要的机制概念来进行描述,这两种概念分别来自格伦南以及马卡梅尔、达登和克雷弗团队。分析结果表明,这两种主要的机制概念都无法充分涵盖自然选择。然而,新机械论哲学具备在这一框架下理解自然选择的资源。