Schweber Silvan S
Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, Science Center 371, Cambridge, MA02138, USA.
Perspect Biol Med. 2009 Winter;52(1):141-52. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0074.
During the 1970s, something deeply consequential happened in the cultural, economic, and social relationships between science and technology. Paul Forman has proposed that the abrupt reversal of the culturally ascribed primacy in the science-technology relationship circa 1980 be taken as a demarcation of postmodernity from modernity. Modernity's most basic cultural presuppositions-the superiority of theory to practice, the elevation of the public over the private and that of the disinterested over the interested, and the belief that the means sanctify the ends-were ascribed to science. In postmodernity, science is subsumed under technology, and the status of technology relative to science reflects our pragmatic-utilitarian subordination of means to ends. These cultural changes have resonated with deep epistemological and ontological changes within the sciences themselves, and all these have manifested themselves in universities becoming entrepreneurial, and the consequences thereof. Science Without Laws insightfully illustrates some of the changes within the life and human sciences by analyzing the role played by model systems and case studies.
在20世纪70年代,科学与技术之间的文化、经济和社会关系发生了一些具有深远影响的事情。保罗·福尔曼提出,大约在1980年科学与技术关系中文化赋予的首要地位的突然逆转,应被视为后现代性与现代性的分界线。现代性最基本的文化预设——理论优于实践、公共高于私人、无私高于有私,以及手段使目的神圣化的信念——都被赋予了科学。在后现代性中,科学被纳入技术之下,技术相对于科学的地位反映了我们在手段与目的关系上实用功利主义的从属关系。这些文化变革与科学自身深刻的认识论和本体论变革产生了共鸣,而所有这些都在大学走向创业及其后果中表现了出来。《没有定律的科学》通过分析模型系统和案例研究所起的作用,深刻地阐释了生命科学和人文科学中的一些变化。