Suppr超能文献

[当代哲学中的精神病话语]

[The discourse of psychosis in contemporary philosophy].

作者信息

Stompe Thomas, Ritter Kristina

机构信息

Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Universität Wien.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr. 2009;23(1):64-70.

Abstract

The preoccupation of philosophy with madness can be traced back till the Greek antiquity. For many philosophers like Descartes psychotic phenomena were symbols for the fragility of human mental powers, while others like Plato or Nietzsche saw madness as a way to escape the constraints of rationality. After 1960 three direction of contemporary philosophy dealt with the topics madness--schizophrenia--psychosis: Following Nietzsche and Bataille, Foucault as well as Deleuze and Guattari considered schizophrenia as the societal oppressed reverse of modern rationality, a notion which had a strong influence on the anti-psychiatric movement. Philosophical phenomenology primarily focussed on ontological problems of the psychotic existence. Finally Philosophy of Mind, the modern Anglo-American version of analytical philosophy, analyzed the logical coherence of psychotic inferences and experiences. Especially the insights of analytical philosophy may be important for a more sophisticated interpretation of psychopathological research as well as of the new findings of neuroscience.

摘要

哲学对疯癫的关注可以追溯到古希腊时期。对于许多哲学家来说,比如笛卡尔,精神错乱现象是人类精神力量脆弱性的象征,而对于像柏拉图或尼采这样的其他人来说,疯癫是逃避理性约束的一种方式。1960年之后,当代哲学的三个方向探讨了疯癫——精神分裂症——精神病这些主题:继尼采和巴塔耶之后,福柯以及德勒兹和加塔利将精神分裂症视为现代理性在社会层面受压迫的对立面,这一观念对反精神病学运动产生了重大影响。哲学现象学主要关注精神病态存在的本体论问题。最后,心灵哲学,即现代英美版的分析哲学,分析了精神病推理和体验的逻辑连贯性。尤其是分析哲学的见解对于更深入地解读精神病理学研究以及神经科学的新发现可能很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验