Santos Lívia O, Marinho Fernanda A, Altoé Ellen F, Vitório Bianca S, Alves Carlos R, Britto Constança, Motta Maria Cristina M, Branquinha Marta H, Santos André L S, d'Avila-Levy Claudia M
Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004918. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
Leishmania is the etiologic agent of leishmanisais, a protozoan disease whose pathogenic events are not well understood. Current therapy is suboptimal due to toxicity of the available therapeutic agents and the emergence of drug resistance. Compounding these problems is the increase in the number of cases of Leishmania-HIV coinfection, due to the overlap between the AIDS epidemic and leishmaniasis.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In the present report, we have investigated the effect of HIV aspartyl peptidase inhibitors (PIs) on the Leishmania amazonensis proliferation, ultrastructure, interaction with macrophage cells and expression of classical peptidases which are directly involved in the Leishmania pathogenesis. All the HIV PIs impaired parasite growth in a dose-dependent fashion, especially nelfinavir and lopinavir. HIV PIs treatment caused profound changes in the leishmania ultrastructure as shown by transmission electron microscopy, including cytoplasm shrinking, increase in the number of lipid inclusions and some cells presenting the nucleus closely wrapped by endoplasmic reticulum resembling an autophagic process, as well as chromatin condensation which is suggestive of apoptotic death. The hydrolysis of HIV peptidase substrate by L. amazonensis extract was inhibited by pepstatin and HIV PIs, suggesting that an aspartyl peptidase may be the intracellular target of the inhibitors. The treatment with HIV PIs of either the promastigote forms preceding the interaction with macrophage cells or the amastigote forms inside macrophages drastically reduced the association indexes. Despite all these beneficial effects, the HIV PIs induced an increase in the expression of cysteine peptidase b (cpb) and the metallopeptidase gp63, two well-known virulence factors expressed by Leishmania spp.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In the face of leishmaniasis/HIV overlap, it is critical to further comprehend the sophisticated interplays among Leishmania, HIV and macrophages. In addition, there are many unresolved questions related to the management of Leishmania-HIV-coinfected patients. For instance, the efficacy of therapy aimed at controlling each pathogen in coinfected individuals remains largely undefined. The results presented herein add new in vitro insight into the wide spectrum efficacy of HIV PIs and suggest that additional studies about the synergistic effects of classical antileishmanial compounds and HIV PIs in macrophages coinfected with Leishmania and HIV-1 should be performed.
利什曼原虫是利什曼病的病原体,这是一种原生动物疾病,其致病机制尚未完全清楚。由于现有治疗药物的毒性和耐药性的出现,目前的治疗方法并不理想。由于艾滋病流行与利什曼病的重叠,利什曼原虫与艾滋病毒合并感染的病例数增加,使这些问题更加复杂。
方法/主要发现:在本报告中,我们研究了艾滋病毒天冬氨酰蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)对亚马逊利什曼原虫增殖、超微结构、与巨噬细胞的相互作用以及直接参与利什曼原虫发病机制的经典蛋白酶表达的影响。所有艾滋病毒蛋白酶抑制剂均以剂量依赖方式损害寄生虫生长,尤其是奈非那韦和洛匹那韦。透射电子显微镜显示,艾滋病毒蛋白酶抑制剂治疗导致利什曼原虫超微结构发生深刻变化,包括细胞质收缩、脂质包涵体数量增加,一些细胞的细胞核被内质网紧密包裹,类似于自噬过程,以及染色质浓缩,提示细胞凋亡死亡。胃蛋白酶抑制剂和艾滋病毒蛋白酶抑制剂可抑制亚马逊利什曼原虫提取物对艾滋病毒蛋白酶底物的水解,这表明天冬氨酰蛋白酶可能是这些抑制剂的细胞内靶点。用艾滋病毒蛋白酶抑制剂处理巨噬细胞相互作用前的前鞭毛体形式或巨噬细胞内的无鞭毛体形式,均会显著降低结合指数。尽管有这些有益作用,但艾滋病毒蛋白酶抑制剂会导致半胱氨酸蛋白酶b(cpb)和金属蛋白酶gp63的表达增加,这两种是利什曼原虫属表达的著名毒力因子。
结论/意义:面对利什曼病/艾滋病毒重叠的情况,进一步了解利什曼原虫、艾滋病毒和巨噬细胞之间复杂的相互作用至关重要。此外,在管理利什曼原虫与艾滋病毒合并感染患者方面,仍有许多未解决的问题。例如,针对控制合并感染个体中每种病原体的治疗效果在很大程度上仍不明确。本文给出的结果为艾滋病毒蛋白酶抑制剂的广泛疗效提供了新的体外见解,并表明应开展更多关于经典抗利什曼原虫化合物与艾滋病毒蛋白酶抑制剂在利什曼原虫和艾滋病毒-1合并感染的巨噬细胞中的协同作用的研究。