Quinlan Michael, Bohle Philip
School of Organisation and Management, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(1):1-44. doi: 10.2190/HS.39.1.a.
Over the past two decades, a leading business practice has been often-repeated rounds of downsizing and restructuring (also referred to as reorganization, re-engineering, and a host of other euphemistic terms) by large private and public sector employers. Frequently associated with other practices such as outsourcing, privatization, and the increased use of temporary workers, downsizing/restructuring has increased the level of job insecurity among workers as well as leading to changes in work processes (including work intensification and multi-tasking) and management behavior. How has downsizing/restructuring and increased job insecurity affected the occupational health, safety, and well-being of workers, and what measures have employers, unions, and governments taken to address any adverse effects? The authors reviewed international studies of the occupational health and safety (OHS) effects of downsizing/restructuring and increased job insecurity undertaken over the past 20 years. After imposing quality filters, they obtained 86 studies. Analysis revealed that 73 (85%) of the studies found poorer OHS outcomes (using a range of measures). Studies were examined to see whether they provided clues as to the reasons for negative outcomes.
在过去二十年里,大型私营和公共部门雇主经常进行一轮又一轮的裁员和重组(也被称为改组、再造工程以及许多其他委婉说法),这已成为一种主要的商业行为。裁员/重组经常与外包、私有化以及增加使用临时工等其他做法相关联,它增加了工人的工作不安全感,同时也导致了工作流程的变化(包括工作强度加大和多任务处理)以及管理行为的改变。裁员/重组以及工作不安全感的增加对工人的职业健康、安全和福祉产生了怎样的影响?雇主、工会和政府采取了哪些措施来应对任何不利影响?作者回顾了过去20年里关于裁员/重组以及工作不安全感增加对职业健康与安全(OHS)影响的国际研究。在施加质量筛选标准后,他们获得了86项研究。分析表明,其中73项(85%)研究发现职业健康与安全结果更差(采用了一系列衡量标准)。对这些研究进行了审查,看它们是否能提供有关负面结果原因的线索。