Suppr超能文献

家长满意度工具的构建:儿科重症监护护士和医生的看法

Construction of a parent satisfaction instrument: perceptions of pediatric intensive care nurses and physicians.

作者信息

Latour Jos M, Hazelzet Jan A, Duivenvoorden Hugo J, van Goudoever Johannes B

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2009 Jun;24(2):255-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Sep 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of the study were (1) to identify parental satisfaction items through the opinions of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) nurses and physicians, (2) to reach consensus on the identified items, and (3) to apply factor analysis to evaluate the items and domains toward a PICU parental satisfaction instrument.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pediatric intensive care unit nurses and physicians working in 8 university hospitals in the Netherlands participated. A 2-round Delphi method was completed. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the satisfaction items and domains.

RESULTS

Three hundred two nurses and 62 physicians participated in the Delphi study, and 269 (76%) completed 2 questionnaire rounds. In Delphi round 2, 14 of the 78 items had a mean of less than 8.0 (range, 1 [low importance] to 10 [high importance]). The interquartile range of all domains decreased by almost half, and only 10 satisfaction items had a heterogeneity of less than 70%. Structure determination revealed that 4 satisfaction items needed to be excluded. Out of 74 satisfaction items, 72 showed factor loadings greater than 0.50. The reliability estimates, Cronbach alpha, for the 6 domains varied from 0.74 to 0.92.

CONCLUSIONS

Priorities in parental satisfaction measures are identified. The findings are fundamental in the development of a PICU parental satisfaction instrument.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)通过儿科重症监护病房(PICU)护士和医生的意见确定家长满意度项目;(2)就确定的项目达成共识;(3)应用因子分析来评估这些项目和领域,以构建PICU家长满意度量表。

材料与方法

荷兰8所大学医院的PICU护士和医生参与了研究。完成了两轮德尔菲法。对满意度项目和领域进行了验证性因子分析。

结果

302名护士和62名医生参与了德尔菲研究,269人(76%)完成了两轮问卷调查。在德尔菲第二轮中,78个项目中有14个项目的平均分低于8.0(范围为1[低重要性]至10[高重要性])。所有领域的四分位间距几乎减少了一半,只有10个满意度项目的异质性低于70%。结构确定显示,有4个满意度项目需要排除。在74个满意度项目中,72个项目的因子载荷大于0.50。6个领域 的信度估计值(Cronbach α)在0.74至0.92之间。

结论

确定了家长满意度测量的优先事项。这些发现对于开发PICU家长满意度量表至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验