Suppr超能文献

主要截肢术后糖尿病合并肢体严重缺血患者的死亡率:是否行过外周血运重建的队列研究数据 564 例连续糖尿病患者的队列研究数据

Mortality after major amputation in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia who did and did not undergo previous peripheral revascularization Data of a cohort study of 564 consecutive diabetic patients.

机构信息

Diabetology Center-Diabetic Foot Center, IRCCS Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 2010 Jul-Aug;24(4):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Mar 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the survival after major lower limb amputation, at a level either below (BKA) or above (AKA) the knee, in diabetic patients admitted to hospital because of critical limb ischemia (CLI).

METHODS

From January 1999 to December 2003, 564 diabetic patients were consecutively admitted to our Foot Center because of CLI and followed up until December 2005. A revascularization procedure was performed in 537 patients (95.2%): in 420 with peripheral angioplasty, in 117 with peripheral bypass graft. Neither endoluminal nor surgical revascularization was practicable in 27 (4.8%) patients.

RESULTS

Major amputation was performed in a total of 55 (9.8%) patients. Among the clinical and demographic variables evaluated, age was significantly lower (67.3+/-10.1 vs. 76.7+/-10.4, P<.001), duration of diabetes was higher (17.1+/-11.1 vs. 13.4+/-10.0, P=.013), and current smoking was more frequent (38.5% vs. 25.0%, P<.001) in revascularized amputees. The amputation free median time for revascularized patients was 5.11 months, and for nonrevascularized patients, 0.33 months. The log-rank test for equality of survivor function without amputation between amputees with or without revascularization was 31.76 (P<.001). Among the 55 amputees, 11 (28.2%) out of the 39 revascularized patients and 13 (81.2%) out of the 16 nonrevascularized patients died. The log-rank test for equality of survivor function was 6.83 (P=.009). The Cox model performed to evaluate the association between the recorded variables and the mortality showed a significant hazard ratio only with age (hazard ratio for 1 year 1.11, P=.003, confidence interval 1.04-1.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the revascularization allows to postpone the major amputation, and that the survival of revascularized amputees is better than that of nonrevascularized amputated patients. All these data offer further encouragement to revascularize all diabetic patients with CLI.

摘要

背景

评估因严重肢体缺血(CLI)而住院的糖尿病患者行膝下(BKA)或膝上(AKA)主要下肢截肢后的生存情况。

方法

1999 年 1 月至 2003 年 12 月,564 例糖尿病患者因 CLI 连续入住我院足部中心并随访至 2005 年 12 月。537 例患者(95.2%)进行了血运重建手术:420 例行外周血管成形术,117 例行外周旁路移植术。27 例患者(4.8%)既不能进行腔内血管重建也不能进行外科血管重建。

结果

共有 55 例(9.8%)患者进行了大截肢。在评估的临床和人口统计学变量中,年龄显著较低(67.3±10.1 岁 vs. 76.7±10.4 岁,P<.001),糖尿病病程较长(17.1±11.1 年 vs. 13.4±10.0 年,P=.013),目前吸烟更频繁(38.5% vs. 25.0%,P<.001)。血运重建截肢者的无截肢中位时间为 5.11 个月,而非血运重建截肢者为 0.33 个月。对截肢者有无血运重建的截肢无功能生存函数的对数秩检验为 31.76(P<.001)。在 55 例截肢者中,39 例血运重建患者中有 11 例(28.2%)和 16 例非血运重建患者中有 13 例(81.2%)死亡。对截肢者有无血运重建的生存函数的对数秩检验为 6.83(P=.009)。为评估记录变量与死亡率之间的关系而进行的 Cox 模型仅显示年龄有显著的危险比(1 年的危险比为 1.11,P=.003,95%置信区间为 1.04-1.19)。

结论

我们的数据表明,血运重建可以推迟大截肢,并且血运重建的截肢者的生存情况优于非血运重建的截肢患者。所有这些数据都进一步鼓励对所有因 CLI 而住院的糖尿病患者进行血运重建。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验