Schrauwers Claire, Dekker Gus
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, University of Adelaide, Australia.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Mar;22(3):218-26. doi: 10.1080/14767050902801652.
Obesity represents a rapidly emerging epidemic amongst pregnant patients in South Australia, in particular in Adelaide's Northern suburbs, one of the poorest urban areas in Australia. The aim of the current study was to prepare a comprehensive overview of maternal and perinatal outcome in overweight, obese and morbidly obese pregnant patients.
Retrospective review of women with singleton pregnancies delivering in the first 6 months of 2006; 100 with normal BMI (group I: BMI 19.1-25 kg/m(2)), 100 overweight (group II: BMI 25.1-30 kg/m(2)), 110 obese (group III: BMI 30.1-40 kg/m(2)) and 60 morbidly obese women (group IV: BMI >40 kg/m(2)) were identified with access to complete medical records. Outcome measures included booking demographics, booking blood pressures, glucose challenge and glucose tolerance results, hypertensive complications, pre-existing and gestational diabetes, instrumental deliveries, caesarean deliveries, blood loss, birth weights, Apgar scores, post-partum complications and psychological problems.
Women in group II, III and IV were characterised by higher systolic booking blood pressure (mean differences: 3.92, 9.94 and 9.84 respectively for group II, III and IV) and higher diastolic booking blood pressures (mean differences 3.02, 6.92 and 9.22 respectively). As a combined group II-IV, women were at increased risk for pre-existing morbidity (OR 2.33) and requiring medication (OR 2.13). Pregnancy hypertension occurred significantly more in group III and IV with OR 2.38 and 3.75. Women without pre-existing hypertension were also found to be at increased risk to develop gestational hypertension only if they belonged to group IV (OR 3.69). Women in group III and IV are at increased risk at gestational diabetes with OR 8.82 and 27.38. Women in group III and IV are less likely to have a spontaneous onset of labour with ORs of 2.18 and 3.51 for not having spontaneous onset of labour. Induction of labour occurred more often in group IV (OR 3.17). Requirement of instrumental deliveries or lower segment caesarean section occurred more often in group II, III and IV with OR 2.20, 3.28 and 5.47 respectively. Significant more blood loss was found in group III and IV with mean differences of 135.42 and 207.94 ml compared with group I. The birthweight in group III and IV are significantly higher with mean differences of 104.86 and 324.94 g. Macrosomia occurred more often in group IV (OR 4.04). Women in group III and IV had a longer overall hospital stay with mean differences of 0.58 and 1.09 days. Mental health issues were more common in group II, III and IV with OR 3.16, 3.53 and 4.17 respectively.
These South Australian data from a socio-economically deprived area in Adelaide's Northern suburbs confirm that obesity during pregnancy represents a major risk for adverse outcome for patients with a whole spectrum of adverse pregnancy outcomes; obesity represents a major challenge for health care providers.
肥胖症在南澳大利亚的孕妇中迅速蔓延,尤其是在阿德莱德北郊,这是澳大利亚最贫困的城市地区之一。本研究的目的是全面概述超重、肥胖和病态肥胖孕妇的孕产妇和围产期结局。
回顾性研究2006年上半年分娩的单胎妊娠妇女;确定了100名BMI正常的妇女(第一组:BMI 19.1-25 kg/m²)、100名超重妇女(第二组:BMI 25.1-30 kg/m²)、110名肥胖妇女(第三组:BMI 30.1-40 kg/m²)和60名病态肥胖妇女(第四组:BMI>40 kg/m²),并获取了完整的病历。结局指标包括登记人口统计学信息、登记血压、葡萄糖耐量试验和葡萄糖耐量结果、高血压并发症、孕前和妊娠期糖尿病、器械助产、剖宫产、失血量、出生体重、阿氏评分、产后并发症和心理问题。
第二组、第三组和第四组妇女的登记收缩压较高(第二组、第三组和第四组的平均差异分别为3.92、9.94和9.84),登记舒张压也较高(平均差异分别为3.02、6.92和9.22)。作为第二组至第四组的合并组,妇女孕前发病风险增加(OR 2.33)且需要药物治疗的风险增加(OR 2.13)。第三组和第四组妊娠高血压的发生率显著更高,OR分别为2.38和3.75。还发现,仅当属于第四组时,无孕前高血压的妇女发生妊娠期高血压的风险增加(OR 3.69)。第三组和第四组妇女患妊娠期糖尿病的风险增加,OR分别为8.82和27.38。第三组和第四组妇女自然发动分娩的可能性较小,未自然发动分娩的OR分别为2.18和3.51。第四组引产的发生率更高(OR 3.17)。第二组、第三组和第四组器械助产或下段剖宫产的需求更频繁,OR分别为2.20、3.28和5.47。第三组和第四组的失血量显著更多,与第一组相比,平均差异分别为135.42和207.94 ml。第三组和第四组的出生体重显著更高,平均差异分别为104.86和324.