Suppr超能文献

生理及标准性激素替代方案对卵巢早衰的心血管影响

Cardiovascular effects of physiological and standard sex steroid replacement regimens in premature ovarian failure.

作者信息

Langrish Jeremy P, Mills Nicholas L, Bath Louise E, Warner Pamela, Webb David J, Kelnar Christopher J, Critchley Hilary O D, Newby David E, Wallace W Hamish B

机构信息

Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA United Kingdom.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2009 May;53(5):805-11. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.126516. Epub 2009 Mar 30.

Abstract

Current hormone replacement therapy may not optimize cardiovascular health in women with premature ovarian failure. We compared the effects of physiological and standard sex steroid replacement regimens on cardiovascular health in these women. In an open-label, randomized, controlled crossover trial, 34 women with premature ovarian failure were randomly assigned to 4-week cycles of physiological (transdermal estradiol and vaginal progesterone) and standard (oral ethinylestradiol and norethisterone) therapy for 12 months. Cardiovascular health was assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and renal and humoral factors. Eighteen women (19 to 39 years of age) completed the 28-month protocol. Both regimens caused similar suppression of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone and provided symptom relief. In comparison with the standard regimen, physiological sex steroid replacement caused lower mean 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressures throughout the 12-month treatment period (ANOVA; P<or=0.0001 for both): systolic blood pressure was 7.3 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.5 to 12.0 mm Hg) and diastolic was 7.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 3.9 to 11.0 mm Hg) lower at 12 months. Although there were no differences in arterial stiffness, physiological sex steroid replacement reduced plasma angiotensin II (ANOVA; P=0.007) and serum creatinine (ANOVA; P=0.015) concentrations without altering plasma aldosterone concentrations. In comparison with a standard regimen, physiological sex steroid replacement in women with premature ovarian failure results in lower blood pressure, better renal function, and less activation of the renin-angiotensin system. These findings have major implications for the future cardiovascular health of young women who require long-term sex steroid replacement therapy.

摘要

目前的激素替代疗法可能无法使卵巢早衰女性的心血管健康达到最佳状态。我们比较了生理剂量和标准剂量性激素替代方案对这些女性心血管健康的影响。在一项开放标签、随机、对照交叉试验中,34名卵巢早衰女性被随机分配接受为期4周的生理剂量(经皮雌二醇和阴道孕酮)和标准剂量(口服炔雌醇和炔诺酮)治疗,为期12个月。通过24小时动态血压、动脉僵硬度以及肾脏和体液因素评估心血管健康状况。18名女性(19至39岁)完成了为期28个月的方案。两种方案对促黄体生成素和促卵泡激素的抑制作用相似,并能缓解症状。与标准方案相比,生理剂量性激素替代在整个12个月治疗期内导致24小时平均收缩压和舒张压更低(方差分析;两者P均≤0.0001):12个月时收缩压低7.3 mmHg(95%CI:2.5至12.0 mmHg),舒张压低7.4 mmHg(95%CI:3.9至11.0 mmHg)。虽然动脉僵硬度没有差异,但生理剂量性激素替代降低了血浆血管紧张素II(方差分析;P = 0.007)和血清肌酐(方差分析;P = 0.015)浓度,而未改变血浆醛固酮浓度。与标准方案相比,卵巢早衰女性采用生理剂量性激素替代可降低血压、改善肾功能并减少肾素 - 血管紧张素系统的激活。这些发现对需要长期性激素替代治疗的年轻女性未来的心血管健康具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验