Albert Khala, van Vlymen Janet, James Paula, Parlow Joel
Department of Anesthesiology, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2009 May;56(5):352-6. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9070-5. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
Ringer's lactate (RL) may be preferable to normal saline (NS) for large volume resuscitation. Authorities recommend against its mixture with packed red blood cells (PRBC) due to a theoretical risk of clotting. The purpose of this study was to test whether RL, as compared with NS, leads to a risk of clotting when used to dilute AS-3 preserved PRBC in a clinically relevant model.
Following Ethics Board approval, eight units of unused, unexpired AS-3 preserved PRBC were obtained. Four sets of two parallel studies were performed, comparing RL with NS as the diluent for PRBC. The mixtures were infused using gravity flow through standard blood filter tubing and fluid warmer, to simulate an intraoperative blood transfusion. A series of progressively more dilute samples was collected. These were filtered and analyzed macroscopically, then using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to quantify the amount of F1+2 (the breakdown products of thrombin generation).
No filters in any of the NS and RL mixtures contained evidence of clot or debris. In the NS group, the F1+2 levels ranged from 2.7 to 38.0 pmol x L(-1). In the RL group, the F1+2 levels ranged from 3.2 to 289.7 pmol x L(-1). All of these values were below the physiologic levels determined in previous studies.
In this simulation of intraoperative blood transfusion, RL did not lead to visible or molecular evidence of activation of the clotting cascade. The current study challenges recommendations that AS-3 PRBC should not be mixed with RL for rapid transfusion.
对于大容量复苏,乳酸林格液(RL)可能比生理盐水(NS)更可取。由于存在理论上的凝血风险,权威机构建议不要将其与浓缩红细胞(PRBC)混合。本研究的目的是在临床相关模型中测试与NS相比,RL用于稀释AS-3保存的PRBC时是否会导致凝血风险。
经伦理委员会批准后,获取了8单位未使用、未过期的AS-3保存的PRBC。进行了4组两组平行研究,比较将RL与NS作为PRBC的稀释剂。混合物通过重力流经标准血液过滤管和液体加温器输注,以模拟术中输血。收集了一系列逐渐稀释的样本。对这些样本进行过滤并进行宏观分析,然后使用酶联免疫吸附测定法来定量F1+2(凝血酶生成的分解产物)的量。
NS和RL混合物中的任何过滤器均未发现有凝血或碎片的迹象。在NS组中,F1+2水平范围为2.7至38.0 pmol×L⁻¹。在RL组中,F1+2水平范围为3.2至289.7 pmol×L⁻¹。所有这些值均低于先前研究中确定的生理水平。
在本次术中输血模拟中,RL未导致凝血级联激活的可见或分子证据。当前研究对AS-3 PRBC不应与RL混合用于快速输血的建议提出了挑战。